Hydrogenation Catalyst Composition for Nitrile Rubber

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing hydrogenated acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (HNBR) face challenges such as high catalyst costs, molecular weight reduction during hydrogenation, and difficulty in achieving low Mooney viscosity, leading to restricted processability and limited applications.

Innovation Solution

A novel hydrogenation catalyst composition is created by contacting a complex hydrogenation catalyst with a co-catalyst in a specific molar ratio, allowing for selective hydrogenation of nitrile rubber while controlling molecular weight and suppressing metathesis activity, enabling the production of HNBR with tailored properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional hydrogenation catalysts (rhodium, palladium) are used, then hydrogenation activity is high, but catalyst cost is high and catalyst removal/recycle cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogenation activityVSAvoidcatalyst cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive, easily removable catalysts such as sulfur compounds, phosphine compounds, or metal salts that can be used in stoichiometric or sub-stoichiometric amounts and then discarded or easily removed from the reaction mixture, eliminating the need for expensive noble metal catalysts and their complex recovery processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces auxiliary substances such as ligands or additives that mediate the catalytic process, enabling the use of cheap metal catalysts (e.g., copper, zinc, manganese) by enhancing their activity through coordination chemistry, thereby replacing expensive rhodium or palladium catalysts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If hydrogenation is performed without molecular weight control, then hydrogenation degree can be increased, but molecular weight reduction occurs leading to restricted processability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogenation degreeVSAvoidprocessability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically optimizes reaction parameters including temperature, pressure, catalyst loading, and solvent type to achieve high hydrogenation degrees (90-99%) while maintaining molecular weight and Mooney viscosity within desired ranges, thereby preserving processability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic control of reaction conditions, adjusting parameters during the hydrogenation process to balance between achieving high hydrogenation conversion and preventing excessive molecular weight reduction, allowing real-time optimization of both hydrogenation degree and processability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If hydrogenation is performed to achieve high hydrogenation degree, then residual double bond content is reduced, but reaction time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual double bond contentVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes temperature-pressure optimization and catalyst selection to dramatically increase hydrogenation reaction rates, achieving 90-99% hydrogenation degrees within 1-24 hours instead of much longer times, by selecting appropriate catalyst systems and operating conditions that accelerate the reaction without compromising selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs highly active catalyst systems and optimized reaction conditions that allow the hydrogenation reaction to proceed rapidly through the rate-determining steps, achieving high conversion in shortened timeframes by bypassing slow reaction phases through catalytic enhancement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

4Quantity of substance

If low catalyst concentration is used, then catalyst cost is reduced, but hydrogenation activity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst concentrationVSAvoidhydrogenation activity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces ligands, additives, or auxiliary catalysts that act as intermediaries to enhance the activity of low-concentration metal catalysts, enabling efficient hydrogenation at reduced catalyst loadings through catalytic cycle enhancement and turnover number improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high hydrogenation degrees in short reaction times with low catalyst concentrations, maintaining or adjusting molecular weight, and reducing the need for catalyst recycling, thus improving processability and expanding application possibilities for HNBR.

Implementation Method 1

the selective hydrogenation of the carbon-carbon double bonds in the diene-based polymer must be conducted without affecting the nitrile groups and other functional groups

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 2

A novel hydrogenation catalyst composition is created by contacting a complex hydrogenation catalyst with a co-catalyst in a specific molar ratio

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS11713361B2Hydrogenation catalyst compositions and their use for hydrogenation of nitrile rubber
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 ARLANXEO DEUT GMBH
  • US11713361B2 patent drawing
  • US11713361B2 patent drawing
  • US11713361B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to novel hydrogenation catalyst compositions obtainable from reacting metal-based complex hydrogenation catalysts with specific co-catalysts and to a process for selectively hydrogenating nitrile rubbers in the presence of such novel hydrogenation catalyst compositions.