Hydronic Control Valve with Sensor-Based Flow Rate Measurement
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing methods for determining the flow rate of a hydronic medium through control valves in hydronic installations are inaccurate due to mechanical tolerances between the hand wheel and gear, and prone to operator calculation errors, requiring the use of datasheets for flow rate determination.
Innovation Solution
A system and method that utilize a sensor to measure the axial distance between the hand wheel and static part of the control valve, combined with a k v-value data means, such as a barcode or RFID tag, to automatically determine the flow rate based on pressure difference and relative position of the valve plunger, eliminating the need for datasheets and accounting for mechanical tolerances.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If manual determination of flow rate using datasheets and operator calculations is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to mechanical tolerances and operator errors
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement methods with an automated sensor-based system. A sensor detects the axial distance between the hand wheel and static part, automatically determining flow rate without operator intervention or mechanical tolerance accumulation. This substitution of manual mechanical operations with automated sensing resolves the contradiction by improving measurement precision while keeping device complexity manageable through electronic rather than mechanical complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The control valve performs self-measurement of flow rate through integrated sensors and processing. The valve automatically determines its own flow rate by sensing hand wheel position and pressure differential, eliminating the need for external operators and datasheets. This self-service capability improves measurement precision while the integration within the existing valve structure prevents excessive increase in device complexity.
2Measurement precision
If automated sensor-based measurement is implemented, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and data processing
Solution Approach 1:
The sensor system serves multiple functions: it measures hand wheel position, determines valve opening degree, calculates flow rate, and potentially provides diagnostic information. By making the measurement system multi-functional, the patent justifies the added complexity through enhanced capabilities beyond simple flow rate measurement, resolving the contradiction between precision improvement and complexity increase.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces an intermediary processing system that translates raw sensor data (axial distance measurements) into meaningful flow rate information. This intermediary layer manages the complexity by providing a clear data processing architecture that bridges the gap between simple sensor outputs and complex flow rate calculations, making the overall system more manageable despite increased complexity.
3Measurement precision
If mechanical hand wheel and gear system is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to mechanical tolerances
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces mechanical measurement of hand wheel position with optical or electromagnetic sensing. Instead of relying on mechanical gear teeth and scales that accumulate tolerance errors, the system uses non-contact sensors to detect hand wheel position, thereby improving measurement precision while preserving the mechanical hand wheel for ease of operation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent separates the operation function from the measurement function. The mechanical hand wheel remains for ease of operation, while a separate sensor system independently measures position without being affected by mechanical tolerances. This segmentation allows each component to optimize for its primary function without compromise.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
Control valve (10) for hydronic installations, comprising: a valve housing (11) providing a valve inlet (12), a valve outlet (13) and a valve seat (16), the valve inlet (12) and the valve outlet (13) being connectable into at least one pipe of the hydronic installation; a valve plunger (17) acting together with the valve seat (16); a hand wheel (24) for adjusting manually the relative position of the valve plunger (17) relative to the valve seat (16) by turning or rotating the hand wheel (24), wherein the hand wheel (24) changes its distance relative to a static part (25) of the control valve when the hand wheel (24) becomes turned; pressure test valves (15) being assigned to the valve housing (11) for measuring the pressure within the valve inlet (12) and for measuring the pressure within the valve outlet (13) of the valve housing (11); wherein the static part (25) of the control valve comprises a section (26) for receiving a sensor (27) adapted to measure the distance between the hand wheel (24) and the static part (25) and thereby the relative position of the valve plunger (17) relative to the valve seat (16); wherein the control valve comprises data means (28) adapted to provide a kv-value of the control valve for each relative position of the valve plunger (17) relative to the valve seat (16) so that a flow rate of a hydronic medium through the control valve can be automatically determined from a pressure difference between the pressure within the valve inlet (12) and the pressure within valve outlet (13), from the relative position of the valve plunger (17) relative to the valve seat (16) and from the respective kv-value corresponding the relative position of the valve plunger (17) relative to the valve seat (16). (Figure 1)