Hydronic System Feed-Forward Control with Valve Authority Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydronic systems face challenges in balancing control accuracy and energy efficiency due to improper sizing of control valves, leading to instability and poor system control, with issues like excessive pressure drops and 'hunting' oscillations affecting overall performance.

Innovation Solution

A hydronic system with a control improvement path, including a feed-forward controller, valve authority determining device, and oscillation suppressing means, which actively measures and adapts valve authority and flow coefficients to optimize control valve operation and suppress unwanted oscillations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the control valve is oversized, then energy consumption is reduced, but control accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic valve sizing by enabling the control valve to switch between multiple sizing configurations (first sizing and second sizing) based on operating conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize between energy efficiency and control accuracy at different operational stages, rather than being constrained by a fixed valve size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameter of valve size by providing at least two control valves with different sizing configurations. The system dynamically selects which valve to use or combines them based on operational requirements, thereby changing the effective valve size parameter to resolve the contradiction between energy loss and control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the control valve is undersized, then control accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between different valve sizing configurations based on operational needs. When high control accuracy is required, the system activates the undersized valve configuration; when energy efficiency is prioritized, it switches to the oversized configuration, thus dynamically resolving the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By providing control valves with different sizing configurations and dynamically selecting between them, the system changes the effective valve size parameter to match operational requirements, allowing optimization of both control accuracy and energy consumption at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a fixed valve size is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to changing hydraulic parameters deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidadaptability to hydraulic changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic valve sizing system where the control valve can switch between at least two different sizing configurations based on changing hydraulic parameters and operational conditions. This dynamic capability allows the system to adapt to varying requirements without increasing overall system complexity, as the switching mechanism is integrated into the existing control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If valve authority is increased, then control accuracy is improved, but pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts valve authority by switching between different valve sizing configurations. When high control accuracy is needed, the system activates the valve configuration that provides higher valve authority; when pressure drop needs to be minimized, it switches to the configuration with lower valve authority, thus dynamically resolving the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3545239A2Hydronic system and method for operating such hydronic system
Publication Date: 2019.10.02 BELIMO HOLDING AG

AI summary

A hydronic system (HS) comprises at least one hydronic circuit (HC) and a control (CT) for controlling the operation of said at least one hydronic circuit (HC) via a control path (CP), whereby said control (CT) comprises a feed forward controller (FFC). Operation of the system is improved by said hydronic system (HS) further comprising a control improvement path (CIP) running from said at least one hydronic circuit (HC) to said control (CT), by means of which control improvement path (CIP) said control (CT) can be improved in the case of said hydronic system (HS) becoming instable and/or showing poor system control.