Hydrophobic Article With Nanoparticle Agglomerates And Binder Layer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Superhydrophobic coatings used in various applications are susceptible to wear, abrasion, and degradation over time due to the lack of surface topography and durability in existing nanoparticle stacking processes.

Innovation Solution

A hydrophobic article is developed with nanoparticle agglomerates of at least 100 nanometers in size, combined with an oxidatively cured silicon-based resin binder layer and an outermost layer, providing enhanced water contact angles and resistance to abrasion through a specific layering process that includes agglomeration and oxidative curing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If nanoparticles are stacked on substrates using only gravity, then the coating process is simple, but the surface topography is very little resulting in low hydrophobicity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating process simplicityVSAvoidsurface topography
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a binder layer as an intermediary substance between the substrate and nanoparticles. This binder layer enables the nanoparticles to adhere to the substrate and form structured arrangements with proper surface topography, resolving the contradiction between simple gravity-based application and the need for precise surface topography.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical-chemical parameters of the nanoparticle system by introducing a binder layer with specific adhesion properties. This parameter change allows nanoparticles to transition from random gravity-driven stacking to organized adhesion-based arrangements, achieving the required surface topography for hydrophobicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If nanoparticles are stacked on substrates using only gravity, then the coating process is simple, but the resistance to abrasion is significantly reduced over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating process simplicityVSAvoidresistance to abrasion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The binder layer serves as a mediating substance that provides mechanical anchoring between the substrate and nanoparticles. This intermediary layer significantly improves abrasion resistance by creating a bonded structure that resists mechanical degradation, while the coating process remains relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure combining the substrate, binder layer, and nanoparticles into an integrated coating system. This composite material approach enhances the overall mechanical properties and abrasion resistance compared to simple nanoparticle stacking, while maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If existing superhydrophobic coatings are used, then water repellency is achieved, but the coatings are susceptible to wear, abrasion, and degradation over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater repellencyVSAvoidcoating durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by introducing a binder layer that provides mechanical support and protection to the nanoparticle structure. This preparatory measure cushions the hydrophobic surface against wear and degradation, extending the coating's service life while maintaining water repellency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining the hydrophobic nanoparticles with a binder layer matrix. This composite structure provides both the water repellency of the nanoparticles and the mechanical durability of the binder, resolving the contradiction between hydrophobic performance and long-term durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The article achieves a water contact angle of greater than 90 degrees and maintains durability after 10,000 abrasion cycles, suitable for applications requiring long-term hydrophobicity and resistance to environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a binder layer disposed on and in direct contact with the nanoparticle layer and including an oxidatively cured product of a silicon-based resin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidative curing: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

The hydrophobic article has a water contact angle of greater than or equal to 90 degrees as measured on the outermost layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic effect: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentUS10358561B2Hydrophobic article
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 DOW SILICONES CORP
  • US10358561B2 patent drawing
  • US10358561B2 patent drawing
  • US10358561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hydrophobic article includes a substrate and a nanoparticle layer disposed on the substrate and including nanoparticle agglomerates wherein the nanoparticle agglomerates have an average volume based size of at least 100 nanometers as determined using light scattering via ISO 13320. The hydrophobic article also includes a binder layer disposed on and in direct contact with the nanoparticle layer and including an oxidatively cured product of a silicon-based resin and an outermost layer that is disposed opposite the substrate and on and in direct contact with the binder layer. The hydrophobic article has a water contact angle of greater than or equal to 90 degrees as measured on the outermost layer of the hydrophobic article and determined using modified ASTM D5946-04.