Hydrophobic Spill-Resistant Borders for Liquid Containment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surfaces lack effective solutions to prevent the spread of liquids, leading to contamination, corrosion, and damage in various settings, such as refrigerators, electronics, and food preparation areas, due to the inability to contain spills effectively.

Innovation Solution

The development of spill-resistant borders and barriers that are applied to surfaces to prevent liquids from spreading beyond a certain height by increasing the hydrophobicity or oleophobicity of the surface, using compositions that covalently attach alkyl, fluoroalkyl, or perfluoroalkyl groups to create a barrier that retains liquids within a defined area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a surface is made hydrophobic or oleophobic to prevent liquid spread, then liquid containment is improved, but the surface becomes more sensitive to liquid height thresholds that can overcome the barrier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid containmentVSAvoidliquid spill damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The surface is divided into multiple regions with different hydrophobicity levels - a central region with lower hydrophobicity for normal liquid placement and peripheral borders with higher hydrophobicity for liquid containment. This segmentation allows the surface to handle liquids differently in different zones, containing spills within acceptable limits while preventing uncontrolled spread.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the surface are given different local properties - the borders are made more hydrophobic than the central region. This local quality differentiation creates a gradient that guides liquid behavior, allowing the surface to maintain reliability for liquid containment while managing the harmful effects of spills by confining them to specific zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If hydrophobic borders are applied to prevent spill spread, then contamination and corrosion are reduced, but the surface treatment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination and corrosionVSAvoidsurface treatment
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrophobic border treatment serves multiple functions simultaneously - it contains liquid spills, prevents contamination, reduces corrosion, and provides a visual indicator of the spill boundary. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate systems while maintaining protection against harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The surface treatment utilizes changes in hydrophobicity parameters to achieve spill containment. By adjusting the hydrophobicity level of border regions compared to central regions, the system creates effective liquid barriers without requiring complex mechanical or chemical containment structures, thus reducing overall device complexity while protecting against contamination and corrosion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents liquids from spreading beyond the border until a critical height is reached, reducing contamination and damage by creating a hydrophobic or oleophobic surface that retains liquids, including aqueous solutions, oils, and alcohols, while maintaining durability and resistance to cleaning and abrasion.

Implementation Method 1

a spill-resistant border that is a portion of a surface forming a perimeter around an area of a surface that has a lower hydrophobicity than the spill-resistant border

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobicity: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 2

the liquids can be lipids or oils that are prevented from spreading beyond a border until the level of the oil or lipid exceeds, e.g., 2 mm above the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOleophobicity: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentUS9096786B2Spill resistant surfaces having hydrophobic and oleophobic borders
Publication Date: 2015.08.04 SSW ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US9096786B2 patent drawing
  • US9096786B2 patent drawing
  • US9096786B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are methods for creating spill-proof or spill-resistant surfaces through the use of hydrophobic or oleophobic (H-SH) edges, borders or/and boundaries that contain the water and other liquids within inside the edges, borders and/or boundaries. Also described herein are spill-proof/spill-resistant surfaces. Liquid (e.g., water and other aqueous solutions/suspension) heights of 3-6 mm on a level planar surface can be sustained by such edges, borders and/of boundaries. The H-SH borders can be created on glass, metal, wood, plastic, and concrete surfaces.