Hydrophobic Coating for Steam Cycle Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Steam power plants face efficiency losses due to heat transfer resistance in condensers and wetness losses in steam turbines, exacerbated by the costly and short-lived nature of hydrophobic coatings required for improved condensation and turbine efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A steam cycle additive is introduced into the water or steam cycle to generate a hydrophobic coating on condenser and turbine surfaces, allowing for continuous application and regeneration while the plant remains online, using amphiphilic, bolaamphiphilic, and hydrophobic chemicals to enhance heat transfer and reduce wetness losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a hydrophobic coating is applied to condenser tubes to improve heat transfer efficiency, then condensation efficiency is improved, but the coating degrades rapidly under operational conditions and requires costly manufacturing or plant shutdown for application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensation efficiencyVSAvoidcoating durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The condenser tube performs its own coating application and maintenance by utilizing the steam cycle water flow. The hydrophobic coating material is introduced into the water cycle, and the flowing water automatically deposits and renews the coating on the condenser tube surfaces during normal operation, eliminating the need for external application systems or plant shutdowns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the chemical parameters of the water cycle by introducing hydrophobic coating materials (such as silicon-based compounds, fluorinated compounds, or wax emulsions) into the steam cycle water. This chemical modification allows the water to deposit a protective hydrophobic layer on the condenser tubes, transforming the surface properties to improve condensation efficiency while maintaining durability through continuous renewal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If a hydrophobic coating is manufactured into condenser tubes prior to installation to achieve drop-wise condensation, then heat transfer resistance is decreased, but the manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrophobic coating is applied to the condenser tubes in advance through the water cycle before the condensation process begins. The coating material is introduced into the water system, allowing the coating to be deposited on the tube surfaces during normal plant operation or startup, eliminating the need for expensive pre-manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The steam cycle water acts as an intermediary carrier for the hydrophobic coating material. Instead of directly applying the coating to the condenser tubes through complex manufacturing processes, the coating material is dissolved or suspended in the water cycle, which then naturally deposits the coating on the tube surfaces during normal operation, significantly reducing manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the steam plant is taken off-line to retrofit hydrophobic coating on condenser tubes, then condensation efficiency is improved, but plant availability and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensation efficiencyVSAvoidplant availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrophobic coating application process is integrated into the continuous water cycle operation. The coating material is continuously or periodically introduced into the circulating water, allowing the condenser tubes to be coated and maintained during normal plant operation without interruption, ensuring continuous productivity and availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The operating steam plant performs its own coating maintenance by utilizing its existing water circulation system. The plant's normal water flow through the condenser tubes serves as the application mechanism for the hydrophobic coating, eliminating the need for external retrofitting operations or plant shutdowns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If conventional film-wise condensation occurs on condenser tubes, then the process is simple, but an insulating liquid film forms that decreases heat rejection efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensation process complexityVSAvoidheat rejection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the surface energy parameters of the condenser tubes by applying a hydrophobic coating through the water cycle. This parameter change transforms the condensation mechanism from film-wise to drop-wise condensation, where the hydrophobic surface causes condensate to form discrete droplets that roll off easily, preventing the formation of insulating liquid films and significantly improving heat rejection efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution increases overall steam power plant efficiency by reducing heat transfer resistance and wetness losses, maintaining efficiency over time without the need for costly pre-coating or plant shutdowns.

Implementation Method 1

supplying a steam cycle treatment to the steam cycle, thereby generating a hydrophobic coating within the steam cycle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic coating formation: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 2

The hydrophobically coated condenser tubes provide a purposeful transition from film-wise condensation to drop-wise condensation, which is a more efficient heat transfer condensation method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer enhancement: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

The hydrophobically coated condenser tubes provide a purposeful transition from film-wise condensation to drop-wise condensation, which is a more efficient heat transfer condensation method. Drop-wise condensation does not suffer from the creation of an insulating liquid film on the steam side of the condenser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrop-wise condensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 4

low-pressure turbines stationary and rotating blades with a low surface energy hydrophobic or water-repellant coating. The hydrophobic property of the coating has the result that small droplets contained in the steam phase, upon impacting a coated blade, roll off across the blade in the form of smaller droplets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWetness loss reduction: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentUS11261762B2Improving steam power plant efficiency with novel steam cycle treatments
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 BL TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11261762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for improving the efficiency of a steam power generation plant, the process providing utilizing steam or water from a steam cycle of a steam power plant; and supplying a steam cycle treatment to the steam cycle, thereby generating a hydrophobic coating within the steam cycle.