Hydrophobic Cigarette Wrapper for CO Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Combustible smoking articles suffer from increased carbon monoxide (CO) concentration in mainstream smoke as the cigarette wrapper's porosity decreases due to tar deposition, leading to reduced air dilution and diffusion, and the paper absorbs water and compounds, causing staining and weakening.

Innovation Solution

A hydrophobic wrapper with a permeability of at least 15 CORESTA units is used, where at least the inner or outer surface is treated with hydrophobic groups to inhibit tar deposition and water absorption, maintaining permeability and preventing staining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the wrapper is made permeable to allow CO diffusion and air dilution, then CO concentration in mainstream smoke is reduced, but the wrapper absorbs water and compounds leading to staining and weakening

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO concentration in mainstream smokeVSAvoidwrapper integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The wrapper is treated with hydrophobic groups at its surface to create a localized hydrophobic layer, while the bulk paper structure remains permeable. This allows the surface to repel water and tar compounds, preventing staining and weakening, while the interior structure maintains CO diffusion and air dilution capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The wrapper combines cellulose-based paper material with hydrophobic groups (such as fatty acid esters or silanes) to create a composite structure that exhibits both permeability for gas diffusion and hydrophobicity for water resistance, resolving the contradiction between maintaining CO diffusion and preventing water absorption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the wrapper porosity is maintained high for CO diffusion, then air dilution rate is improved, but tar deposition increases on the wrapper surface

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO diffusion rateVSAvoidtar deposition on wrapper
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The wrapper surface is modified with hydrophobic groups to create a localized hydrophobic barrier that prevents tar deposition, while the bulk paper structure maintains its porosity for CO diffusion and air dilution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrophobic surface treatment that would normally be expected to reduce permeability actually prevents tar deposition that would otherwise block the pores, thereby maintaining the CO diffusion pathway by preventing the harmful accumulation of tar on the wrapper surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If hydrophobic treatment is applied to the wrapper surface, then water absorption is reduced, but permeability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater resistanceVSAvoidpermeability to gases
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrophobic treatment is applied specifically to the wrapper surface in a controlled manner, creating a hydrophobic layer that does not completely seal the pores, allowing gas molecules to pass through while blocking water and larger tar compounds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The wrapper utilizes its porous structure combined with hydrophobic surface treatment, where the pores remain open for gas diffusion but the hydrophobic surface tension prevents water and tar compounds from entering and blocking the pores

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hydrophobic wrapper maintains higher CO diffusion and air dilution rates, reducing CO in mainstream smoke and preventing water absorption, which helps in maintaining the wrapper's integrity and reducing visible staining.

Implementation Method 1

At least an inner or outer surface of the wrapper is hydrophobic via hydrophobic groups chemically bonded to the wrapper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic effect: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 2

The porosity may affect the amount of diffusion of CO out of the tobacco rod through the wrapper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

The porosity of this wrapper may affect the amount of dilution air entering the tobacco rod through the cigarette wrapper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDilution:

Data Source

PatentUS10542773B2Hydrophobic paper
Publication Date: 2020.01.28 PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS SA
  • US10542773B2 patent drawing
  • US10542773B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A smoking article includes a tobacco substrate and a wrapper disposed about the tobacco substrate. At least an inner or outer surface of the wrapper is hydrophobic via hydrophobic groups chemically bonded to the wrapper. The wrapper has a permeability of at least about 15 CORESTA units.