Hydroponic Grower Controller for Scalable Seed Bed Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydroponic systems fail to provide a cost-effective solution for seed production, as they are not easily scalable to fit varying seed production volumes and do not efficiently manage water and other input costs, labor, and operational footprint, leading to inefficiencies in seed growth and return on investment.

Innovation Solution

A controller for a hydroponic grower system that includes a programmable logic controller and graphical user interface, allowing for customizable seed bed configurations, automated seeding, harvesting, and irrigation, enabling efficient water and resource management, and maximizing return on investment by tailoring operations to specific seed production needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing hydroponic control systems are used, then basic seed growing function is provided, but the system is not easily tailorable to fit the size of herd and does not address return on investment criteria

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetailorability to fit seed production volumeVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independently controllable zones, each with its own seed bed trays and control parameters. This segmentation allows the system to be configured for different production volumes by activating or deactivating specific zones, making the system easily tailorable without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates dynamic configuration capabilities where control parameters, zone activation, and operational settings can be adjusted in real-time based on desired production volume. This dynamic adaptability allows the same physical system to serve different herd sizes and production requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If traditional seed growing methods are used, then seed production is achieved, but input costs including water, labor, and operational footprint are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater usage efficiencyVSAvoidseed production efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors water consumption, environmental conditions, and seed growth progress, automatically adjusting irrigation schedules and resource allocation to optimize water usage efficiency while maintaining high seed production rates. This feedback mechanism ensures both resource conservation and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring and control of growth conditions, ensuring optimal resource utilization at all times. By maintaining continuous useful action through automated environmental control and resource management, the system achieves both water efficiency and high productivity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If manual seed growing operations are used, then flexibility in handling is provided, but labor costs and operational efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseed production volumeVSAvoidautomated harvesting and cleaning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates automated harvesting and cleaning mechanisms that operate autonomously to manage seed production workflows. These self-service features handle tasks such as tray retrieval, seed harvesting, and cleaning without manual intervention, significantly reducing labor costs while maintaining high production volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated control systems that use sensors, actuators, and programmable logic to manage seeding, irrigation, harvesting, and cleaning processes. This substitution of mechanical automation for manual labor increases both productivity and operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of substance

If hydroponic systems are implemented, then water conservation is achieved, but cost-effectiveness for seed production is not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater conservationVSAvoidcost-effectiveness of seed production
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts hydroponic parameters such as nutrient solution concentration, irrigation timing, and flow rates to optimize both water conservation and cost-effectiveness. By changing operational parameters based on real-time conditions and production goals, the system achieves water efficiency while maintaining economical seed production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The hydroponic system is designed with multi-functional capabilities that allow it to serve different production scales and seed types using the same core infrastructure. This universality reduces per-unit costs and improves cost-effectiveness while maintaining water conservation benefits across various operational scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12041891B2Controller for a hydroponic grower
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 HYDROGREEN INC
  • US12041891B2 patent drawing
  • US12041891B2 patent drawing
  • US12041891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for a hydroponic growing apparatus, system, and method is provided. The controller includes a programmable logic controller housed within a control housing and a graphical user interface operable by the programmable logic controller and disposed on the control housing. A home screen has one or more status indicators for each seed bed on the plurality of levels. A seeding screen has one or more seeding controls for actuating a seeder for depositing seed on each seed bed on the plurality of levels. A harvesting screen has one or more harvesting controls for autonomously controlling seed growth harvesting from each seed bed on the plurality of levels.