Hydroponic Light Maintenance Dolly for Automated Tray Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial-scale hydroponics systems require more automation to reduce manual labor and increase efficiency, as existing systems often rely heavily on manual operations and lack advanced automation solutions.

Innovation Solution

The development of an automated hydroponics system comprising a rectangular frame with a light panel and mounting members, including electrically conductive inserts, and a light maintenance dolly that can move between levels to align and place light assemblies, supporting LED growth lights and featuring a loader and carriage system for tray management and light assembly positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual labor is used for tray handling and light maintenance, then operational flexibility is maintained, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated mechanisms where the carriage automatically transports trays between grow chambers and maintenance areas, and the light assembly automatically positions and secures itself to troughs using engagement members, reducing dependency on continuous manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automation system is divided into separate functional modules: a carriage for tray transport, a light assembly with engagement members for positioning, and a control system, allowing independent optimization and maintenance of each component while collectively improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If automated machinery is introduced for tray and light management, then labor requirements decrease, but system complexity and initial investment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational easeVSAvoidautomation equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated mechanical systems where motors drive the carriage along rails to transport trays, and engagement members with actuators automatically position and secure light assemblies to troughs, improving ease of operation through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The carriage serves multiple functions by transporting both trays between grow chambers and maintenance areas, while the light assembly with engagement members performs both positioning and securing operations, reducing the number of separate devices needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If light assemblies are manually positioned and secured to troughs, then positioning accuracy can be achieved, but time consumption and labor intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight assembly positioning precisionVSAvoidtime for light maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The light assembly performs self-positioning through engagement members that automatically engage with the trough structure, securing the light assembly in the correct position without requiring manual alignment, thereby reducing time consumption while maintaining positioning precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Engagement members act as intermediaries between the light assembly and the trough, providing a mechanical interface that ensures accurate positioning and secure attachment, transferring the positioning function from manual operation to automated mechanical engagement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If LED growth lights with specific spectra are used, then plant growth is enhanced, but energy consumption and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant growth rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses LED lights that emit specific wavelengths optimized for plant photosynthesis, changing the spectral parameters of the light source to enhance plant growth efficiency while consuming less energy compared to traditional lighting systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The light assembly integrates multiple LEDs with different spectral characteristics into a single unit, creating a composite light source that provides the full spectrum needed for optimal plant growth at reduced energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces manual labor, enhances plant growth through precise light spectrum control, and improves the efficiency of hydroponics operations by automating light maintenance and tray handling, enabling scalable and controlled plant cultivation.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of light emitting diodes (LEDs) secured to the housing that have emit a spectrum selected for plant growth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emitting diode (LED): Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentUS11363761B2Automated hydroponics system
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 NEUHOFF JR ROBERT V
  • US11363761B2 patent drawing
  • US11363761B2 patent drawing
  • US11363761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus is provided. There is a substantially rectangular frame having a plurality of corners with a light panel that is secured to the frame. Brackets a first opening are secured to each corner. Mounting members are secured to the brackets. The mounting members have: a first body; a second and third aligned openings formed in the first body; a fourth opening formed in the first body; and a plurality of second bodies, where each second body extends from the bottom face of the first body. Also, each second body includes a front and a rear, wherein the front of each second body is at least partially set back from the front face of the first body, and wherein the rear of each second body is substantially aligned with the rear face of the first body.