Hydroski Steering via Roll Angle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydroski-borne watercraft face challenges in directional control at high speeds without conventional thrust vectoring and rudders, leading to increased hydrodynamic drag and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Directional control is achieved by adjusting the roll angle of individual hydroskis about their longitudinal axes, generating side forces that enable steering without submerged steering mechanisms, using electric motors, hydraulic, or pneumatic actuators to coordinate the rolling motion of the hydroskis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional thrust vectoring and rudders are used for directional control, then steering capability is improved, but hydrodynamic drag increases and fuel economy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering capabilityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes conventional submerged steering mechanisms (rudders and thrust vectoring systems) from the watercraft design. By extracting these drag-generating components entirely and replacing them with a surface-based hydroski steering system, the invention eliminates the source of hydrodynamic drag while maintaining steering capability through roll angle control of the hydroskis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the traditional mechanical submerged rudder system with a hydrodynamic surface-based system using hydroskis. Instead of using submerged surfaces to generate steering forces, the system uses the roll motion of surface-skimming hydroskis to generate side forces through hydrodynamic pressure differences, substituting a more efficient mechanical-hydrodynamic approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If conventional submerged steering mechanisms are used, then directional control is achieved, but hydrodynamic friction and drag increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectional controlVSAvoidhydrodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes all submerged steering mechanisms from the system. By taking out the rudders and submerged thrust vectoring components that generate hydrodynamic drag, the invention leaves only the essential propulsion and surface-skimming hydroskis, thereby eliminating the harmful drag effect while maintaining directional control through alternative means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions steering control from the traditional submerged three-dimensional flow field to a surface-based two-dimensional hydrodynamic interaction. By moving the steering mechanism from underwater to surface level and using roll angle control, the system exploits surface wave dynamics and atmospheric interaction, representing a dimensional shift from submerged to surface operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Power

If submerged thrust mechanisms are used, then propulsion is achieved, but fuel consumption increases due to increased drag

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsion capabilityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes submerged thrust mechanisms from the watercraft design and replaces them with surface-based propulsion systems. By extracting the drag-generating submerged components and using surface-skimming hydroskis with shallow entry angles, the invention reduces hydrodynamic resistance and consequently decreases the energy required for propulsion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes key operational parameters including the entry angle of the hydroskis (maintaining shallow angles of attack) and the operational draft (reducing submerged depth). These parameter changes optimize the balance between lift generation and drag reduction, enabling efficient propulsion with lower fuel consumption while maintaining adequate thrust capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of energy

If shallow entry angles and shallow operational drafts are used, then fuel economy is improved, but steering control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economyVSAvoidsteering control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic control through active adjustment of hydroski roll angles. Instead of relying on fixed geometric configurations, the system uses actuators to dynamically vary the roll angles of individual hydroskis in real-time, enabling precise steering control despite the shallow entry angles and reduced submerged depth that improve fuel economy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements a feedback control system that monitors the watercraft's heading and position, then adjusts the roll angles of the hydroskis accordingly. This closed-loop control compensates for the reduced steering authority inherent in shallow draft configurations, maintaining ease of operation while preserving the fuel economy benefits of the shallow entry angle design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces hydrodynamic drag, decreases fuel consumption, and improves fuel economy by eliminating the need for conventional steering mechanisms, while maintaining maneuverability and ride quality even in high seas.

Implementation Method 1

In high speed conditions, hydroski-borne watercraft must generate enough hydrodynamic lift from a plurality of hydroskis to lift the displacement hull out of the water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic lift:

Implementation Method 2

Other drivers such as hydraulic and/or pneumatic motors and/or cylinders can also be effectively employed to provide a pivoting, banking or rolling motion to one or more hydroskis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic force: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

Other drivers such as hydraulic and/or pneumatic motors and/or cylinders can also be effectively employed to provide a pivoting, banking or rolling motion to one or more hydroskis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic force:

Implementation Method 4

The side force on an individual hydroski is proportional to the sine of the roll angle of the hydroski with respect to the surface of the water and the lift force is proportional to the cosine of the roll angle of the hydroski with respect to the surface of the water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic side force:

Data Source

PatentUS8201512B2Watercraft steering system
Publication Date: 2012.06.19 ELBERT GREGORY J
  • US8201512B2 patent drawing
  • US8201512B2 patent drawing
  • US8201512B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A steering system for hydroski-borne watercraft eliminates the need for conventional steering mechanisms such as rudders or thrust vectoring from propulsion units. Complete steering and navigable control is achieved by rolling or otherwise banking individual hydroskis thereby creating a side force on each hydroski. This force is proportional to the sine of the bank angle or roll angle. The sum of the forces and moments from the individual hydroskis are of sufficient magnitude and can be appropriately balanced to effect coordinated watercraft steering and navigable control.