Hydrostatic Body Composition System with Shock Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current body composition measurement methods, such as electrical impedance scales and skin calipers, are inaccurate and unreliable, especially for individuals with pathological conditions, and conventional DEXA methods are costly and limited in availability, while existing hydrostatic systems face challenges with transportation and accuracy due to inadequate design for shock and vibration loads.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining body composition in a hydrostatic environment using a weighing device, subject load transfer structure, and container with liquid, which measures dry and wet weights to calculate body density and composition, incorporating hardware processors to determine residual lung volume, gastrointestinal volume, and fat mass fraction, providing accurate and independent measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional DEXA methods are used for body composition analysis, then measurement accuracy is improved, but cost and availability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebody composition measurement accuracyVSAvoidcost and availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the expensive DEXA imaging system with a mechanical hydrostatic weighing system that uses a weighing device and liquid container to measure body composition through buoyancy forces, achieving comparable accuracy at lower cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent recreates the gold-standard hydrostatic weighing measurement capability in a simplified, portable format that copies the essential measurement principle without requiring expensive laboratory equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If existing hydrostatic systems are transported, then accessibility is improved, but measurement accuracy is worsened due to shock and vibration loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility and accessibilityVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates shock-absorbing mounting structures and vibration isolation elements that are pre-installed to protect the weighing device from transportation shocks and vibrations, maintaining measurement accuracy during mobile operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent includes leveling mechanisms and adjustment systems that allow the operator to correct for tilt and position variations after transportation, restoring the measurement system to its optimal calibration state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If electrical impedance scales are used for body composition measurement, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement reliability is worsened due to fluctuations from hydration and metabolic state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electrical impedance measurement with mechanical hydrostatic weighing that directly measures body volume through buoyancy, providing measurements that are not affected by hydration status or metabolic variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If skin caliper method is used for body fat measurement, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision is worsened for individuals with higher body fat or pathological conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual skin caliper measurement with an automated hydrostatic weighing system that objectively measures body composition through physical principles, eliminating operator skill limitations and anatomical accessibility constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system offers accurate and reliable body composition analysis, reducing errors and discomfort, allowing for private measurements, and is cost-effective by eliminating the need for swinging plates and technician intervention, while ensuring accuracy and safety through proper leveling and reduced exposure to water.

Implementation Method 1

a weighing device configured to measure at least one of a dry weight, and a wet weight corresponding to a body density of the subject

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

a container, comprising a liquid and the subject load transfer structure within the liquid, for determining the wet weight of the subject in a hydrostatic environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS20240237918A1System and method for determining a body composition in a hydrostatic environment
Publication Date: 2024.07.18 BOND AUSTIN
  • US20240237918A1 patent drawing
  • US20240237918A1 patent drawing
  • US20240237918A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determining body composition of subject in hydrostatic environment is disclosed. The system includes weighing device to measure dry weight and wet weight of subject, subject load transfer structure to receive load of subject, container with liquid, and container load transfer structure to transfer load from weighing device to container. System includes processors to receive user input comprising attributes of subject and determine residual lung volume of subject. Further, processors determine body density based on residual lung volume, gastrointestinal volume, water density, and both dry and wet weights of subject (shown in equation (3)). Further, processors determine fat-mass fraction and lean mass fraction of subject based on body composition derived from body density.