Hydrostatic Unit Volumetric Efficiency Diagnostic Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In vehicles equipped with hydrostatic transmissions, diagnosing faults is challenging as it is difficult to determine whether the issue lies within the hydrostatic unit, electro-valve, or other components, often leading to unnecessary replacement of the hydrostatic unit, resulting in high maintenance costs and time consumption.

Innovation Solution

A method to test the hydrostatic transmission by calculating the actual and expected values of volumetric efficiency, allowing for evaluation of the hydrostatic unit's quality without disassembly, thereby identifying if replacement is necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of repair

If the hydrostatic unit is removed and replaced to resolve transmission faults, then the vehicle can be quickly repaired, but maintenance costs increase and time is lost due to unnecessary replacements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequick repairVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary diagnostic testing by calculating volumetric efficiency parameters before any replacement action is taken. This preliminary assessment identifies whether the hydrostatic unit actually requires replacement, preventing unnecessary disassembly and replacement operations that would waste time and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical disassembly and replacement of the hydrostatic unit with a computational diagnostic method. By using parameter calculations based on measurable quantities (pressures, flows, speeds) to assess unit condition, the method substitutes mechanical intervention with intelligent diagnostics, reducing both time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of repair

If the hydrostatic unit is removed and replaced to resolve transmission faults, then the vehicle can be quickly repaired, but maintenance costs increase due to unnecessary replacements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequick repairVSAvoidmaintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary diagnostic testing by calculating volumetric efficiency parameters before any replacement action is taken. This preliminary assessment identifies whether the hydrostatic unit actually requires replacement, preventing unnecessary disassembly and replacement operations that would waste time and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical disassembly and replacement of the hydrostatic unit with a computational diagnostic method. By using parameter calculations based on measurable quantities (pressures, flows, speeds) to assess unit condition, the method substitutes mechanical intervention with intelligent diagnostics, reducing both time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If the hydrostatic unit is tested by disassembly and inspection, then accurate fault diagnosis can be achieved, but time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical disassembly and replacement of the hydrostatic unit with a computational diagnostic method. By using parameter calculations based on measurable quantities (pressures, flows, speeds) to assess unit condition, the method substitutes mechanical intervention with intelligent diagnostics, reducing both time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The method introduces computational parameters (volumetric efficiency calculations) as an intermediary between raw measurements and fault diagnosis. These calculated parameters serve as a bridge that translates easily measurable quantities into meaningful diagnostic information about hydrostatic unit condition, achieving accurate diagnosis without physical disassembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If the hydrostatic unit is tested by disassembly and inspection, then accurate fault diagnosis can be achieved, but maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical disassembly and replacement of the hydrostatic unit with a computational diagnostic method. By using parameter calculations based on measurable quantities (pressures, flows, speeds) to assess unit condition, the method substitutes mechanical intervention with intelligent diagnostics, reducing both time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The method introduces computational parameters (volumetric efficiency calculations) as an intermediary between raw measurements and fault diagnosis. These calculated parameters serve as a bridge that translates easily measurable quantities into meaningful diagnostic information about hydrostatic unit condition, achieving accurate diagnosis without physical disassembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2780611B1A method for testing a hydrostatic transmission
Publication Date: 2018.01.10 CNH IND ITALIA SPA
  • EP2780611B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2780611B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2780611B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for testing a transmission of a vehicle, the transmission including a hydrostatic unit (5) installed on the vehicle, comprises the following steps: - calculating an actual value (Q) of a parameter which is indicative of the volumetric efficiency of the hydrostatic unit (5), in a working condition; determining an expected value (QEJ; QE I) of said parameter in said working condition, said actual value ( Q ) being comparable with said expected value ( QEJ; QE I) in order to evaluate how the hydrostatic unit (5) is working.