Hydrotreated Stream Hydrogenation for Sulfur Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing facilities designed for specific product grades often fail to produce higher quality hydrotreated oils, and impurities interfere with purification processes, necessitating a method to enhance and upgrade hydrotreated streams for improved lubricant properties.

Innovation Solution

A process involving hydrogenation of hydrotreated streams with low sulfur content to produce high-quality lubricants, including the integration of a reactor zone with fluid transfer devices, heat exchangers, and hydrogenation reaction vessels to achieve a product stream with reduced sulfur levels and increased saturated hydrocarbon content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high severity hydroprocessing is used to produce highly saturated oils, then sulfur content is reduced and product quality is improved, but manufacturing facilities designed for certain grades cannot produce higher quality products and impurities interfere with purification processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidimpurities
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process is divided into two distinct zones: a hydrotreatment zone for initial processing and a hydrogenation reaction zone for final purification. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally, with the hydrogenation zone specifically targeting sulfur removal to produce higher quality products free from impurities that would interfere with purification processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The harmful sulfur impurities are extracted and removed from the hydrotreated stream through the hydrogenation reaction zone. The process specifically targets and removes sulfur content from no more than about 300 ppm down to no more than about 5 ppm, extracting the harmful factor that prevents production of higher quality products

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If existing lube manufacturing units are used, then production capacity is maintained, but they cannot produce higher grade products with lower sulfur and higher saturate content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct gradeVSAvoidfeedstock flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrogenation reaction zone is designed with multi-functionality to handle various feedstocks including traditional waste lubricating oils and non-traditional hydrocarbon sources. The zone can process different feedstock types while consistently producing higher grade products with lower sulfur and higher saturate content, making the facility adaptable to changing feedstock availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The process changes key parameters including reducing sulfur content from no more than about 300 ppm to no more than about 5 ppm, and increasing saturate content to produce higher grade products. These parameter changes enable existing units to transition from producing standard grade lubricants to higher API Grade III products

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If hydrotreated streams are produced without further hydrogenation, then processing time is reduced, but sulfur content remains above 5 ppm and product quality does not meet higher API grade standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidsulfur content
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrotreatment zone performs preliminary processing to reduce sulfur content to no more than about 300 ppm before the stream enters the hydrogenation reaction zone. This preliminary action prepares the feedstock for the final hydrogenation step, ensuring that the subsequent sulfur removal to no more than about 5 ppm is achieved efficiently without excessive processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process enhances the quality of hydrotreated streams to meet higher API grade standards, such as Group III, by reducing sulfur levels and increasing saturated hydrocarbon content, resulting in improved lubricant properties like higher viscosity index and thermal stability, and allowing for the revamping of existing units to produce higher valued products.

Implementation Method 1

hydrogenating the hydrotreated stream having no more than about 300 ppm, by weight, sulfur based on the weight of the stream in a hydrogenation reaction zone to produce a product stream having no more than about 5 ppm, by weight, sulfur

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentUS8173009B2Process for improving a hydrotreated stream
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 UOP LLC
  • US8173009B2 patent drawing
  • US8173009B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One exemplary embodiment can be a process for improving a hydrotreated stream for lubricating a machine. The hydrotreated stream can include an effective amount of one or more saturated hydrocarbons. Generally, the process includes hydrogenating the hydrotreated stream having no more than about 300 ppm, by weight, sulfur based on the weight of the stream in a hydrogenation reaction zone to produce a product stream having no more than about 5 ppm, by weight, sulfur.