Hydrotreating and Hydrocracking Integration for ULSD Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current diesel production methods face challenges in achieving ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) due to high sulfur content in mild hydrocracking products and the need for additional processing steps, which increase capital and operating costs.

Innovation Solution

Separating hydrotreating and hydrocracking reactors into distinct stages, followed by fractionation to remove hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, allowing the hydrocracking reactor to operate in a cleaner environment for enhanced sulfur conversion and producing ULSD.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If mild hydrocracking is used to produce diesel, then diesel yield is improved, but sulfur content increases making ULSD production difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediesel yieldVSAvoidsulfur content
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the hydrocracking process into two distinct stages: a first hydrocracking stage that produces diesel and a second hydrocracking stage that treats the diesel stream. This segmentation allows the first stage to maximize diesel yield while the second stage specifically addresses sulfur removal, resolving the contradiction between high diesel yield and low sulfur content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first hydrocracking stage performs preliminary conversion of the hydrocarbon feed to diesel before the second stage. By pre-converting the feed in a controlled manner and then subjecting the diesel stream to additional hydrocracking with optimized conditions, the process achieves both high diesel yield and effective sulfur removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If additional processing steps are added to remove sulfur, then sulfur content is reduced, but capital and operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur contentVSAvoidprocessing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two hydrocracking functions into a single integrated process where diesel is produced and treated in sequence through two hydrocracking stages. This combines what would traditionally be separate processes (diesel production and sulfur removal) into one continuous flow, reducing the need for additional standalone processing units and associated infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The second hydrocracking stage serves multiple functions: it further converts hydrocarbons to diesel and simultaneously removes sulfur from the diesel stream. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated sulfur removal units, reducing overall device complexity while achieving ULSD specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If hydrocracking operates in traditional configuration, then process simplicity is maintained, but sulfur conversion is insufficient for ULSD

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess configurationVSAvoidsulfur conversion
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the hydrocracking process into two distinct stages with different optimization goals. The first stage focuses on diesel production while the second stage is optimized for sulfur removal. This segmentation allows each stage to operate under conditions best suited for its specific function, achieving ULSD levels without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different operating conditions and catalyst configurations to different stages of the process. The second hydrocracking stage uses conditions specifically tailored for sulfur conversion (such as higher hydrogen partial pressure and specific catalyst composition) while the first stage uses conditions optimized for diesel yield, creating local quality variations that maximize overall performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces sulfur levels in diesel, enabling the production of ULSD while minimizing additional processing requirements and associated costs.

Implementation Method 1

Hydrotreating refers to a process in which olefins and aromatics are saturated and heteroatoms, such as sulfur, nitrogen and metals are removed from the hydrocarbon feedstock over catalyst in the presence of hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrotreating: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

The hydrotreating effluent stream is separated into a vaporous hydrotreating effluent stream comprising hydrogen and a liquid hydrotreating effluent stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

The liquid hydrotreating effluent stream is fractionated to provide a diesel stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFractionation: Distillation

Implementation Method 4

Hydrocracking refers to a process in which hydrocarbons crack in the presence of hydrogen and catalyst to lower molecular weight hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrocracking: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS9074146B2Process and apparatus for producing diesel from a hydrocarbon stream
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 UOP LLC
  • US9074146B2 patent drawing
  • US9074146B2 patent drawing
  • US9074146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process and apparatus are disclosed for hydrotreating a hydrocarbon feed in a hydrotreating unit and hydrocracking a second hydrocarbon stream in a hydrocracking unit. The hydrocracking unit and the hydrotreating unit may share the same recycle gas compressor. A make-up hydrogen stream may also be compressed in the recycle gas compressor. A hydrocracking separator separates recycle gas and hydrocarbons from the hydrocracking unit to be processed with effluent from the hydrotreating unit.