Hyper Temporal Lidar With Controllable Detection Intervals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lidar systems face challenges in operating with low latency and adapting rapidly to environmental changes, particularly in automotive applications where high-speed movement or rapid decision-making is required, due to the pressure on laser sources from variable firing rates and the need to prevent overheating.

Innovation Solution

A transient laser energy model and transient mirror motion model are used to predict and manage energy and motion over short time intervals, allowing for precise scheduling of laser pulses and coordinated detection intervals, enabling high-rate, low-latency operation with intelligent targeting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the laser source firing rate is increased to reduce latency and improve response time, then the speed of detection is improved, but the laser source overheats and exceeds maximum energy limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidlaser source temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of the laser source firing rate based on real-time temperature monitoring. The control system continuously monitors laser source temperature and adjusts the firing rate accordingly, increasing it when temperature is within safe limits and reducing it when approaching thermal thresholds, thereby resolving the contradiction between detection speed and overheating prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a feedback control mechanism where temperature sensors continuously monitor the laser source temperature and feed this information back to the control system. The control system processes this feedback and adjusts the firing rate in real-time, creating a closed-loop system that automatically balances detection speed requirements with thermal management constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the laser source firing rate is variable to adapt to different detection needs, then the adaptability is improved, but the energy management becomes complex and requires transient modeling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiring rate adaptabilityVSAvoidenergy management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by developing transient energy models that predict laser source energy state and temperature evolution before actual firing sequences occur. These models allow the control system to pre-calculate safe firing rates and energy delivery parameters for different operational scenarios, simplifying real-time decision-making despite the complexity of variable rate operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent manages complexity by systematically varying key parameters such as firing rate, pulse duration, and energy per pulse according to pre-established models and operational requirements. The control system adjusts these parameters in a coordinated manner based on target distance, detected object characteristics, and current laser source state, transforming complex energy management into a structured parameter optimization problem

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If high density laser pulses are fired at detected objects of interest, then the measurement precision is improved, but the laser source operational capabilities are exceeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection precisionVSAvoidlaser source reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by alternating between high-density pulse sequences for detailed target examination and lower-density sequences for thermal management. The control system structures laser firing in periodic cycles where periods of high-rate pulsing (for precision measurement) are followed by periods of reduced activity (for laser source recovery), thereby maintaining both measurement precision and source reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by delivering high-density laser pulses only to specific regions of interest rather than uniformly across the entire field of view. The control system identifies targets requiring detailed examination and concentrates laser energy on those specific areas, allowing high measurement precision for critical targets while limiting overall energy consumption and thermal load on the laser source

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11686845B2Hyper temporal lidar with controllable detection intervals based on regions of interest
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 AEYE INC
  • US11686845B2 patent drawing
  • US11686845B2 patent drawing
  • US11686845B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lidar receiver that includes a photodetector circuit can be controlled so that the detection intervals used by the lidar receiver to detect returns from fired laser pulse shots are closely controlled. Such control over the detection intervals used by the lidar receiver allows for close coordination between a lidar transmitter and the lidar receiver where the lidar receiver is able to adapt to variable shot intervals of the lidar transmitter (including periods of high rate firing as well as periods of low rate firing). The lidar receiver can define the detection intervals based on a region in the field of view that a laser pulse shot is targeting (e.g., setting longer detection intervals for laser pulse shots targeting a horizon region, setting shorter detection intervals for laser pulse shots targeting a region that intersects within the ground within a relatively short distance of the lidar system).