Hyperdexterous Surgical Arm Layout for Mobile Tool Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic surgical systems are limited by their bulkiness, restricted flexibility, and inability to simultaneously use manual and robotic tools, leading to reduced efficiency and increased complexity in surgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

The hyperdexterous surgical system features a compact and modular design, allowing for the simultaneous use of manual and hyperdexterous surgical tools, and enables the surgeon to be mobile during procedures, with enhanced information feedback and adjustable tool positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a large robotic arm is used to control the robotic tool, then the robotic tool can be positioned and controlled, but the system becomes bulky and less flexible

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsystem size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm is divided into multiple segments (first arm segment, second arm segment, third arm segment) that can move independently relative to each other. This segmentation allows the system to achieve complex positioning with smaller, more flexible components rather than requiring a single large rigid arm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nesting by placing the rotate/translate mechanism within the third arm segment, and positioning the robotic tool within the rotate/translate mechanism. This nested arrangement minimizes the overall system footprint while maintaining full functionality, allowing components to be compactly organized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Manufacturing precision

If robotic tools are used, then surgical precision is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic tool is designed with multi-functionality, incorporating an end effector that can perform multiple surgical tasks (grasping, cutting, stapling) and a rotate/translate mechanism that provides both rotational and translational movements. This reduces the need for multiple separate tools and simplifies the overall system while maintaining surgical precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates dynamic elements including a rotate/translate mechanism that can switch between rotational and translational modes, and a wrist mechanism with multiple degrees of freedom. These dynamic capabilities provide surgical precision while avoiding the complexity of entirely rigid, over-engineered structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the robotic arm is made compact, then flexibility is improved, but the workspace access may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidworkspace access
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm utilizes three-dimensional spatial arrangement with segments extending in different directions (first arm segment in first direction, second arm segment in second direction, third arm segment in third direction). This multi-directional approach allows a compact structure to access large workspace volumes by exploiting the third dimension rather than requiring large horizontal footprints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic rotate/translate mechanism and wrist mechanism with multiple degrees of freedom enable the compact robotic arm to access diverse workspace areas by changing its configuration and orientation, rather than requiring a large static structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If manual tools are used, then the system is simpler, but the surgeon cannot simultaneously use manual and robotic tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidtool versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system is designed with universal capabilities that can perform tasks traditionally done with manual tools. The end effector can replicate manual tool functions (grasping, cutting) while adding robotic precision, allowing the system to replace or supplement manual tools rather than coexist with them, thus maintaining simplicity while increasing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12220285B2Hyperdexterous surgical system
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 SRI INTERNATIONAL
  • US12220285B2 patent drawing
  • US12220285B2 patent drawing
  • US12220285B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hyperdexterous surgical system is provided. The system can include one or more surgical arms coupleable to a fixture and configured to support one or more surgical tools. The system can include an electronic control system configured to communicate electronically with the one or more robotic surgical tools. The control system can electronically control the operation of the one or more surgical tools. The system can include one or more portable handheld controllers actuatable by a surgeon to communicate one or more control signals to the one or more surgical tools via the electronic control system to operate the one or more surgical tools. The one or more portable handheld controllers can provide said one or more control signals from a plurality of locations of an operating arena, allowing a surgeon to be mobile during a surgical procedure and to remotely operate the one or more surgical tools from different locations of the operating arena.