Hypergraph Model for Detecting Persistent Image Branding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning approaches fail to effectively track and analyze image components, particularly indirect features, which are more persistent and resistant to countermeasures, in propaganda images used by sophisticated actors, leading to evasion of detection systems.

Innovation Solution

The system focuses on analyzing direct and indirect image traits, using a hypergraph model to identify subtle branding features and transformations, and incorporates deep learning with a knowledge base to detect persistent image components across countermeasure windows, enabling more robust identification of images from specific actors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning approaches focus on detecting specific direct features (such as unusual fonts or text characteristics), then detection precision for known features is improved, but sophistication of actors can easily evade detection by switching to different features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidevasiveness to countermeasures
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the analysis into two distinct types of features: direct image features (visible characteristics like fonts, text, images) and indirect image features (metadata, provenance, distribution patterns). This segmentation allows the system to detect both the content and the context, making it harder for actors to evade detection by simply changing visible features, as the indirect features provide additional detection vectors that are harder to manipulate without detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to feature analysis by incorporating indirect features that exist in a different space than direct visual features. Instead of only analyzing what is visible in the image, the system analyzes metadata, file properties, distribution patterns, and provenance information—essentially moving from a 2D visual analysis to a multi-dimensional analysis that includes temporal, spatial, and contextual dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If countermeasures are implemented to block and de-platform objectionable content, then detection capability is improved, but actors quickly switch to other imagery or evasive actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidspeed of evasion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by analyzing indirect features and distribution patterns before objectionable content can be widely disseminated or before actors can successfully evade detection. By examining metadata, provenance, and distribution characteristics early in the content lifecycle, the system can identify and flag potentially problematic content before it gains traction, allowing for earlier intervention and reducing the speed at which actors can evade detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously learn from detected content and actor responses. By analyzing how actors modify their content in response to detection and blocking, the system adapts its detection algorithms to anticipate and identify new evasion techniques, creating a continuous improvement loop that maintains detection reliability even as actors attempt to evade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained to detect specific features, then detection accuracy for those features is improved, but the features become obsolete when actors make simple changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detection accuracyVSAvoidpersistence of detection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal detection system that can identify multiple types of features across different modalities. Instead of training separate models for each specific feature (font, text, image content), the system uses a unified approach that analyzes direct features, indirect features, and distribution patterns simultaneously. This multi-functional capability allows the system to maintain detection effectiveness even when actors change specific features, as the universal model can adapt to detect variations across multiple feature types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11594012B2System and method for detecting and analyzing digital communications
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 CHENOPE INC
  • US11594012B2 patent drawing
  • US11594012B2 patent drawing
  • US11594012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer readable medium for analyzing images according to specific kinds of features oriented towards detecting subtle branding features (intentional or otherwise) rather than relying on the usual image similarity detection methods. Also disclosed are steps to enhance standard machine learning techniques to identify new types of transformations by partitioning data into measure-countermeasure windows, which may be either/both detected computationally or inputted into a knowledgebase. The invention further incorporates direct and indirect traits of images that were likely to have been promulgated by a particular group or actor of interest, especially those traits that prove to be more invariant over time (including the use of transformations) which have proven to be more resistant to countermeasures applied in different jurisdictions. More generally, almost all embodiments allow individual feature calculations to be toggled on and off, and to define sets of features according to jurisdiction.