Hypersonic Disc Apparatus for Nanoparticle Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current top-down methods for producing nanoparticles are inefficient, with mechanical mills producing less than 5% nanoparticles from input material, causing blade damage, contamination, and high energy consumption, and often require chemicals.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus with a core comprising two discs with hypersonic blades arranged in concentric rings, where the blades have sharp leading and trailing edges and suction surfaces to accelerate and collide material, reducing impact with blades and enhancing particle production efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional mechanical mills with aerodynamical blades are used for top-down nanoparticle production, then material can be processed, but blade damage and abrasion occur leading to contamination and low nanoparticle yield (less than 5%)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoparticle yieldVSAvoidblade durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional aerodynamical blades with hypersonic blades that operate on different mechanical principles. The hypersonic blades are designed to minimize direct contact and collision with input material, using shock wave generation and expansion waves instead of traditional aerodynamic forces, thereby reducing blade damage while maintaining processing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters by using hypersonic speeds and specific blade geometries (sharp leading edge, sharp trailing edge, suction surface, pressure surface) to generate expansion waves. This changes the interaction mechanism from direct mechanical collision to wave-based material acceleration and collision, improving nanoparticle yield while reducing blade wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If traditional mechanical mills are used, then material processing is achieved, but material collisions with blades cause contamination and environmental damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcontamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes traditional blade collision mechanisms with hypersonic blade-generated expansion waves that accelerate material particles. This reduces direct blade-material contact, minimizing material removal from blades and subsequent contamination of the processed nanoparticles and environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If traditional bottom-up processes are used for nanoparticle production, then nanoparticles can be produced, but chemical usage and high energy consumption are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoparticle productionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical bottom-up processes with a mechanical top-down approach using hypersonic blades. This substitution eliminates the need for chemical reagents and reduces energy consumption by using direct mechanical acceleration and collision rather than thermal or chemical processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the production approach from chemical synthesis to mechanical size reduction using hypersonic blade geometry and shock wave generation, achieving nanoparticle production with lower energy input and without chemical additives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus effectively produces nanoparticles by minimizing material-blade collisions, reducing contamination, and achieving higher yields while minimizing energy consumption and blade damage.

Implementation Method 1

The hypersonic blades comprise a sharp leading edge, a sharp trailing edge and a suction surface and pressure surface configured to produce an expansion wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 2

The hypersonic blades comprise a sharp leading edge, a sharp trailing edge and a suction surface and pressure surface configured to produce an expansion wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExpansion wave: Shock Wave

Data Source

PatentEP4527503A1Apparatuses and methods for producing particles
Publication Date: 2025.03.26 SIMA MARC
  • EP4527503A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4527503A1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP4527503A1 patent drawingFigure 6A~6B

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to apparatuses for producing (nano)particles and optionally to sinter materials, and to top-down methods for producing nanoparticles using such apparatuses. A core of such an apparatus comprises a first disc and a second disc including hypersonic blades arranged in concentric rings and channels between those rings. The first disc and the second disc are arranged such that the channels of each disc surround at least in part the hypersonic blades of the other disc.