Hyperspectral Target Detection via Artifact Removal and Whitening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hyperspectral image processing techniques face challenges in detecting sparse and weak targets due to high levels of false alarms and computational complexity, particularly in environments with clutter and sensor artifacts.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves pre-adjusting hyperspectral images to remove artifacts and using a combination of whitening transforms, mixture coefficients, and spectral matching/unmatching ratios to improve detection resolution and reliability, employing a system with a target scoring engine and non-target scoring engine to determine the presence of targets within the image.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard hyperspectral detection techniques are used, then detection coverage is achieved, but false alarm rate increases and detection precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidtarget detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple independent stages: artifact removal preprocessing, whitening transform, mixture coefficient calculation, and residual spectrum analysis. Each stage processes specific aspects of the detection problem separately, allowing for more precise control over false alarm reduction while maintaining detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Artifact removal is performed as a preliminary action before target detection. By removing sensor artifacts and background clutter in advance, the detection algorithm operates on cleaner data, significantly reducing false alarms without requiring more complex detection logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If complex detection algorithms are employed, then detection capability improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The whitening transform serves as an intermediary step that simplifies the spectral data structure before detection. By transforming the hyperspectral data to remove correlations between bands, subsequent detection operations become computationally simpler while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm changes the parameter representation of spectral data through whitening transform and mixture coefficient decomposition. This parameter transformation converts complex spectral signatures into simpler, more interpretable components that are easier to process and analyze.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If high detection thresholds are applied, then false alarms are reduced, but detection of weak targets deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm reductionVSAvoidweak target detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm transitions from single-threshold detection in one dimension to multi-dimensional analysis using mixture coefficients and residual spectra. By evaluating targets across multiple spectral dimensions and combining evidence from different sources, the system can use lower effective thresholds without increasing false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection process incorporates feedback through iterative refinement of mixture coefficients and residual spectrum analysis. The system continuously adjusts its detection criteria based on the accumulated evidence from multiple spectral components, allowing for more sensitive detection of weak targets while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces false alarms and enhances the detection of sparse and weak targets by simplifying the processing algorithms and improving the accuracy of target identification, even in complex environments.

Implementation Method 1

Hyperspectral sensors, on the other hand, collect image data across dozens if not hundreds of spectral bands, combining the technology of spectroscopy and remote imaging.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpectroscopy: Absorption Spectroscopy

Implementation Method 2

As different materials reflect wavelengths of visible and invisible light selectively, analysis of the contiguous wavelength spectrum permits finer resolution and greater perception of information contained in the image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS8897570B1Detection of targets from hyperspectral imagery
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 RAYTHEON CO
  • US8897570B1 patent drawing
  • US8897570B1 patent drawing
  • US8897570B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a process and system for detection of sparse or otherwise weak targets in a hyperspectral image. A hyperspectral image is received having a multitude of pixels, with each pixel having a respective spectrum. In some embodiments, multiple mean spectra are selectively determined for respective sub-regions of the hyperspectral image. The subset mean spectra can be selectively removed from respective pixels, thereby improving image fidelity due to sensor artifacts. Additionally, target detection of such an adjusted image can be determined by one or more of matched filter techniques or by partial un-mixing. In at least some embodiments target detection is enhanced by combining a measure of target match with a residual spectrum determined as a measure of un-match. Target detection can be further improved by application of rules, for example, related to target detection threshold.