Hyperthread Idle Workload Loop for Consistent CPU Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cloud-computing environments, hyperthreading performance is inconsistent due to the impact of one hyperthread on another, particularly when multiple virtual machines share processing cores, leading to undesirable performance variations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an idle workload loop and resource capping mechanisms to maintain consistent performance by determining application profiles, executing tailored idle workload loops, and prioritizing instruction threads to manage hyperthreads within processing cores, ensuring that active threads do not exceed set resource limits and that high-priority threads preempt lower-priority ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If hyperthreading is implemented to share CPU resources across multiple threads, then resource utilization efficiency is improved, but performance consistency between hyperthreads deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational state parameter of idle hyperthreads by introducing synthetic workloads that modify execution behavior. When a hyperthread enters idle state, the system injects synthetic instructions to maintain its execution state, preventing performance variations caused by complete idle periods. This parameter change enables the hyperthread to maintain consistent performance while still sharing resources effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous useful action by having idle hyperthreads execute synthetic workloads that maintain execution state continuity. Instead of completely stopping when idle, the hyperthread continuously executes synthetic instructions that simulate useful work, thereby maintaining performance consistency and preventing the performance boosts that would disrupt other threads sharing the same CPU core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Use of energy by stationary object

If idle hyperthreads are completely stopped to save resources, then energy consumption is reduced, but performance consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by having idle hyperthreads execute synthetic workloads. Rather than completely stopping, the hyperthread continues executing synthetic instructions that maintain its execution state, ensuring performance consistency while still reducing energy consumption compared to full workload execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the execution state parameter by introducing synthetic workloads that modify how idlehyperthreads behave. These synthetic workloads adjust the hyperthread's operational parameters to maintain performance consistency without requiring full workload execution, thus balancing energy savings with performance stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If resource sharing is increased among multiple hyperthreads, then system throughput is improved, but performance variability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem throughputVSAvoidperformance variability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action through synthetic workloads that keep idlehyperthreads in an execution state. This continuous execution prevents performance variability by ensuring allhyperthreads contribute consistently to system throughput, rather than having some hyperthreads completely idle and others fully loaded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the execution characteristics of idlehyperthreads through synthetic workloads. These parameter changes adjust execution state, instruction types, and workload characteristics to maintain consistent performance across allhyperthreads while still allowing high resource sharing for improved system throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9104485B1CPU sharing techniques
Publication Date: 2015.08.11 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9104485B1 patent drawing
  • US9104485B1 patent drawing
  • US9104485B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Architectures and techniques for substantially maintaining performance of hyperthreads within processing cores of processors. One technique can include determining that at least one of two or more hyperthreads has entered an idle state. The technique can further include executing an idle workload loop that comprises a set of instructions that substantially simulates execution of the one of the two or more hyperthreads that has entered the idle state.