Hypertransformer Meta-RL Policy Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing meta-reinforcement learning techniques struggle to efficiently learn reinforcement learning methods for machine-learned models, often requiring extensive training time and resources, and may bias towards premature exploitation rather than effective exploration.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a computer-implemented method using a hypertransformer-based system that generates and updates policy parameters in an episodic fashion. This system includes obtaining hypertransformer and policy parameters, generating a set of hypertranformers, evaluating their performance based on rewards received during evaluation episodes, and updating the parameters to improve policy generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional reinforcement learning techniques are used for meta-RL, then the model can learn reinforcement learning methods, but the training time and resources required are extensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-computing and storing transformation parameters in a lookup table before actual meta-RL training. These pre-computed parameters capture common RL transformation patterns, allowing the model to quickly retrieve and apply them during training without extensive real-time computation, thus reducing training time while maintaining learning effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the meta-RL learning process into discrete transformation operations that can be independently computed and stored. By breaking down the complex learning task into separable transformation components (each representing a specific RL modification), the system can pre-compute these segments and retrieve them efficiently during training, improving productivity without sacrificing learning depth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If traditional RL optimization is used, then the model can optimize policy parameters, but it may bias towards premature exploitation rather than effective exploration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy optimization reliabilityVSAvoidexploration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces transformation parameters as an intermediary between the base RL policy and the optimized policy. These parameters act as a mediator that systematically modifies policy behavior, allowing the model to explore different optimization strategies without directly committing to premature exploitation. The intermediary layer enables controlled exploration of the policy space while maintaining reliable optimization through structured transformations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies parameter changes by systematically modifying policy parameters through pre-computed transformation operations rather than direct gradient optimization. This approach changes the parameter optimization landscape, allowing the model to explore diverse policy configurations more effectively. The transformations enable the system to escape local optima and maintain adaptability while achieving reliable policy improvement through structured parameter modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If hypertransformer-based meta-RL is implemented, then policy generation becomes more efficient and exploration is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy generation speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system reduces complexity through preliminary action by pre-computing transformation parameters and storing them in lookup tables before deployment. This pre-processing step captures complex transformation logic in advance, allowing the runtime system to simply retrieve and apply pre-computed parameters rather than performing complex computations in real-time, thus maintaining high productivity with simpler operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses copying by replicating pre-computed transformation parameters across multiple policy optimization instances. Instead of重新computing transformations for each policy, the system copies proven transformation parameters from the lookup table to new policy contexts, enabling efficient policy generation without repeatedly executing complex transformation logic, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250131280A1Meta-Reinforcement Learning Hypertransformers
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250131280A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131280A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131280A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Machine-learning systems for meta-reinforcement learning (Meta-RL) can include a transformer-based hypernetwork to generate policy parameters in an episodic fashion. An initial policy can be executed in a computing environment over an initial exploration episode during which the computing environment generates episode data. The episode data can be provided as an input to the hypertransformer network which generates an improved policy which is executed in the computing environment to generate episode data. This process is repeated over a predetermined number of episodes. A cumulative reward associated with execution of the policy for a final policy is optimized. The final policy can be optimized for both exploration and exploitation associated with a particular task. The final policy can include a machine-learned model and/or weights for a machine-learned model.