Hypoxic Euthanasia Chamber via Vacuum Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current animal euthanasia methods, such as gaseous, physical, and anesthetic overdose, face challenges including the need for specialized gases, risk of injury, aesthetic objections, and reliance on licensed personnel, as well as potential chemical exposure and prolonged suffering.

Innovation Solution

A hypoxic euthanasia device that simulates high-altitude atmospheric pressure to induce hypoxia, using a pressure adjustment vessel with an atmospheric pressure control system to reduce oxygen availability, allowing for humane and quick euthanasia without the need for specialized gases or personnel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If gaseous euthanasia is used, then euthanasia effectiveness is improved, but cost and complexity of gas procurement and storage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeuthanasia effectivenessVSAvoidgas procurement and storage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the euthanasia function from specialized chemical substances and implements it through physical atmospheric pressure reduction. The vacuum system removes the need for stored gases by creating a controlled low-pressure environment that induces hypoxia, thereby eliminating the complexity of gas procurement, storage, and handling while maintaining euthanasia effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the chemical mechanism (gas administration) with a mechanical/physical mechanism (vacuum pressure reduction). The atmospheric pressure control assembly uses vacuum pumps and pressure regulation systems to create hypoxic conditions through pressure differential rather than chemical asphyxiation, substituting mechanical pressure control for chemical gas delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Speed

If physical euthanasia is used, then euthanasia speed is improved, but risk of injury to personnel and animals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeuthanasia speedVSAvoidrisk of physical injury
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces atmospheric pressure control as an intermediary mechanism between the operator and the animal. Instead of direct physical contact with firearms or bolts, the operator controls the atmospheric environment within the chamber through vacuum systems and pressure regulation assemblies. This intermediary approach maintains rapid euthanasia while eliminating the direct physical danger associated with handling high-velocity projectiles or mechanical trauma devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a controlled atmospheric environment within the chamber that is physically isolated from the external surroundings. The sealed chamber with pressure control assemblies establishes an inert environment where euthanasia occurs through atmospheric pressure differential rather than direct physical force, protecting both personnel and animals from the harmful effects of physical trauma while maintaining procedural speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Reliability

If anesthetic overdose is used, then euthanasia reliability is improved, but requirement for licensed personnel and chemical handling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeuthanasia reliabilityVSAvoidpersonnel licensing and chemical handling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the euthanasia function from controlled chemical substances (barbiturates and other anesthetics) and implements it through physical atmospheric pressure reduction. By removing the dependency on licensed chemical agents, the system eliminates the need for veterinarian supervision and special handling procedures while maintaining reliable euthanasia outcomes through controlled hypoxia.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the pharmacological mechanism (anesthetic drug administration) with a physical mechanism (atmospheric pressure control). The vacuum system and pressure regulation assemblies create hypoxic conditions through pressure differential rather than chemical depression of the central nervous system, substituting mechanical/physical control for chemical pharmacology and eliminating the need for licensed personnel and chemical handling protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If specialized gases are used, then euthanasia effectiveness is improved, but cost of procurement and storage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeuthanasia effectivenessVSAvoidcost of gases and equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the euthanasia function from expensive specialized gases (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, chloroform vapor) and implements it through atmospheric pressure reduction using vacuum systems. This eliminates the need to procure, store, and handle costly compressed gases while maintaining euthanasia effectiveness through controlled hypoxia created by pressure differential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, reusable gas cylinders and specialized equipment with a vacuum system that uses atmospheric pressure differential. The vacuum pumps and pressure regulation assemblies create temporary low-pressure environments without requiring permanent storage of costly substances, effectively using disposable atmospheric pressure control instead of expensive recurring gas purchases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides a quick, humane, and reliable method of euthanasia, minimizing risk to individuals and other animals, eliminating the need for secondary steps and specialized handling, while reducing costs and avoiding chemical exposure.

Implementation Method 1

The euthanasia process is initiated by actuation of the atmospheric pressure control assembly. The atmospheric control assembly signals the atmospheric pressure adjustment assembly to reduce the atmospheric pressure inside the pressure adjustment vessel according to pre-programmed criteria in the atmospheric pressure control assembly, causing hypoxia of the animal.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHypoxia:

Data Source

PatentUS8267080B2Hypoxic chamber for euthanasia of animals and method of use
Publication Date: 2012.09.18 SUNDBERG PAUL
  • US8267080B2 patent drawing
  • US8267080B2 patent drawing
  • US8267080B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A euthanasia device is provided for euthanizing animals through hypoxia. The euthanasia device has a pressure adjustment vessel having an inner chamber and first and second ends. A chamber access door is in communication with the first end of the pressure adjustment vessel. Further an atmospheric pressure adjustment assembly and an atmospheric pressure control assembly are in communication with the pressure adjustment vessel. A method of use for the euthanasia device is also disclosed.