IAB Node Synchronization Beam Signaling Overhead Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication networks, especially in 5G radio access technologies, Integrated Access and Backhaul (IAB) nodes face challenges in managing resources and timing due to shared time/frequency resources, particularly in scenarios where land-bound connections are not feasible, requiring new approaches for efficient operation, especially for downlink timing in child IAB nodes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves scheduling beam sweeping with synchronization beams that carry information signaling to replace synchronization signaling, allowing for efficient use of resources by reducing redundant signaling, and adapting to stable communication links between IAB nodes, which are not highly mobile.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If beam sweeping with synchronisation beams is performed to provide synchronisation signaling, then synchronisation reliability is improved, but signaling overhead and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronisation reliabilityVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the synchronisation signaling function with the existing signaling beam by making the signaling beam carry replacement information that replaces synchronisation signaling. This merging eliminates the need for separate synchronisation beams, reducing signaling overhead while maintaining synchronisation reliability through the shared beam structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The signaling beam is designed to serve multiple functions: it carries both replacement information for downlink timing and, when needed, synchronisation signaling. This multi-functionality allows the same beam resource to fulfill different purposes, reducing the total number of beams required and minimizing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Area of stationary object

If separate synchronisation beams are used for beam sweeping, then synchronisation coverage is improved, but device complexity and resource management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronisation coverageVSAvoidbeam management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the synchronisation beam with the signaling beam, so that a single beam structure handles both signaling and synchronisation functions. This reduces the number of separate beams that need to be managed, simplifying the beam sweeping process and reducing device complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The signaling beam is designed as a universal beam that can carry both replacement information and synchronisation signaling. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated beams for each function, reducing the overall beam management complexity while maintaining full synchronisation coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If replacement information is carried on the signaling beam, then resource efficiency is improved, but timing management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidtiming management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the receiving node provides timing advance information back to the transmitting node. This feedback loop enables the receiving node to adjust its timing based on actual reception conditions, simplifying the timing management complexity while maintaining high resource efficiency through the replacement information mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes in the form of timing advance adjustments and downlink timing indications to manage timing differences. By dynamically adjusting these parameters based on feedback and operational conditions, the system maintains resource efficiency while managing timing complexity through standardized parameter modifications rather than complex timing algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12150076B2Synchronisation signaling for integrated access and backhaul nodes
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12150076B2 patent drawing
  • US12150076B2 patent drawing
  • US12150076B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is disclosed a method of operating an Integrated Access and Backhaul (IAB) node (200, C, N3) in a wireless communication network, the IAB node being in a communication link with a second IAB node using a signaling beam, the IAB node further being scheduled to perform beam sweeping with a plurality of synchronisation beams, one of the synchronisation beams corresponding to the signaling beam; wherein a synchronisation beam is scheduled to carry synchronisation signaling; and wherein the method comprises performing beam sweeping such that the synchronisation beam corresponding to the signaling beam carries information signaling replacing the synchronisation signaling at least in part. The disclosure also pertains to related methods and devices.