Aggregate IC Current Demand Management for PMIC Sizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power management ICs (PMICs) are often oversized and expensive due to being designed for worst-case current demand scenarios, which rarely occur in real-world usage, leading to increased system costs.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that monitor and manage the aggregate current demand of components like processors and graphics processors within an integrated circuit, altering operational characteristics such as frequency to reduce current demand when it exceeds a threshold, allowing for the selection of a smaller and less expensive PMIC.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power supplies are designed based on worst-case current demand scenarios, then reliability is improved, but device size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply reliabilityVSAvoidpower supply size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic current demand management by monitoring actual current consumption of IC components and adjusting operational characteristics in real-time. The system transitions from static worst-case design to dynamic adaptive operation, allowing the power supply to be sized for typical usage while managing peak demands through active control rather than over-design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operational parameters (current demand) dynamically by modifying the operational characteristics of IC components based on actual usage patterns. This allows the system to achieve reliability through active parameter adjustment rather than passive over-design, thereby reducing power supply size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If power supplies are designed based on worst-case current demand scenarios, then reliability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces static worst-case design with dynamic real-time monitoring and adjustment of current demand. This allows manufacturers to produce smaller, less expensive power supplies that rely on active management rather than over-design, reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that monitor actual current consumption and adjust operational characteristics accordingly. This feedback-driven approach allows the system to achieve reliability through active control rather than conservative over-design, thereby reducing manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Weight of stationary object

If aggregate current demand is reduced by modifying operational characteristics, then power supply size can be reduced, but system performance may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply sizeVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operational characteristics based on actual current demand patterns. By continuously monitoring and adapting to real-time usage patterns, the system can reduce power supply size while maintaining optimal performance for typical workloads, rather than being constrained by rare worst-case scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors current demand in advance and proactively adjusts operational characteristics before peak demands occur. This preliminary action allows the power supply to be sized for typical usage while preventing concurrent peak draws through anticipatory control, balancing size reduction with performance maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10255231B1Apparatus and methods for managing aggregate integrated circuit (IC) current demand
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
  • US10255231B1 patent drawing
  • US10255231B1 patent drawing
  • US10255231B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes apparatuses and techniques for managing aggregate IC current demand. In some aspects, respective indications of first and second amounts of current consumed by IC components are received from the IC. The first and second amounts of current are combined to determine an aggregate current demand for the components of the IC. This aggregate current demand is then compared to a threshold for an amount of current that can be provided to the components of IC. Responsive to the aggregate current demand exceeding the threshold, an operational characteristic of one of the components is modified to reduce the aggregate current demand of the components of the IC. This can be effective to prevent the IC from drawing more current than can by supplied to the IC.