Integrated Circuit Defect Identification Using Data Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional high-throughput optical inspection systems lack resolution to detect defects in integrated circuits, while high-resolution electron beam systems have low throughput, making them unsuitable for inline defect inspection due to long scanning times and high false positive/negative rates in die-to-die and die-to-database techniques.

Innovation Solution

The D3D method and system use data fusion, decision tree, and boosting techniques to generate feature data from input patterns, integrating defect detection results to achieve high sensitivity and specificity, reducing the need for high-resolution images and improving inspection efficiency by focusing on 'care areas' with potential defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional high-throughput optical inspection systems are used, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to insufficient resolution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoiddefect detection resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system segments the wafer into multiple regions of interest (ROIs) or 'care areas' based on process conditions and defect probabilities. Instead of inspecting the entire wafer at high resolution, only selected regions are subjected to detailed examination, thereby maintaining high throughput while improving defect detection capability in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different inspection strategies to different regions of the wafer. High-resolution inspection is applied locally to identified care areas where defects are most likely to occur or where process variations are greatest, while other regions receive standard or reduced inspection, optimizing the balance between productivity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If high-resolution electron beam systems are used, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to low throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection resolutionVSAvoidinspection throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The wafer inspection is segmented into multiple passes and regions. Electron beam inspection is applied only to specific care areas identified in earlier stages, rather than scanning the entire wafer. This segmentation enables high-resolution inspection to be performed on limited regions, improving throughput while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary optical inspection and process condition analysis before applying electron beam inspection. Regions are pre-identified as care areas based on process parameters and initial screening, so that the high-resolution electron beam system only needs to inspect predetermined regions, significantly reducing total inspection time while maintaining high defect detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If die-to-die or die-to-database techniques are used, then measurement precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to high false positive and negative rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoiddefect identification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces process condition data and multiple defect detection techniques as intermediaries between the raw inspection data and final defect identification. By analyzing process conditions and combining results from multiple detection methods, the system reduces false positives and negatives, improving the reliability of defect identification while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The defect detection system uses a composite approach combining multiple defect detection techniques (e.g., optical inspection, electron beam inspection, process condition analysis) rather than relying on a single method. This multi-technique composite strategy cross-validates findings and reduces false indications, thereby improving the reliability of defect identification while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS10628935B2Method and system for identifying defects of integrated circuits
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 DONGFANG JINGYUAN ELECTRON LTD
  • US10628935B2 patent drawing
  • US10628935B2 patent drawing
  • US10628935B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for identifying defects in an integrated circuit are provided. The method includes receiving input data of a pattern associated with an integrated circuit, determining feature data associated with features of the pattern using the input data, determining defect detection results associated with the pattern using the input data, the feature data, and defect detection techniques, and determining a defect identification result using the defect detection results. The system includes a processor and a memory. The memory is coupled to the processor and configured to store a set of instructions to receive input data of a pattern associated with an integrated circuit, determine feature data associated with features of the pattern using the input data, determine defect detection results associated with the pattern using the input data, the feature data, and defect detection techniques, and determine a defect identification result using the defect detection results.