Integrated Circuit Delay Path Testing Confidence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing integrated circuits are inefficient in identifying critical delay paths due to variations in production, leading to increased testing time and potential errors.

Innovation Solution

A method that predicts and ranks critical delay paths based on actual measurements, generating a confidence measurement to determine the likelihood of testing the most critical paths, and modifies prediction techniques for improved accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more delay paths are tested to ensure actual critical paths are covered, then testing reliability is improved, but testing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting reliabilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary testing on a subset of delay paths before full production testing. By initially testing a smaller set of paths and using the results to update predictions, the system identifies critical paths more efficiently without requiring exhaustive testing of all possible delay paths, thus reducing overall testing time while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where actual delay measurements from preliminary testing are used to update and refine the predicted critical delay paths. This feedback loop allows the system to adapt predictions based on real data, improving the accuracy of identifying critical paths and enabling more reliable testing with fewer paths examined

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If predicted critical delay paths are used for testing, then testing efficiency is improved, but accuracy of identifying actual critical paths deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy of identifying critical paths
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary testing on predicted critical delay paths before production testing. This preliminary action validates the predictions and provides actual measurement data that can be used to refine the prediction model, ensuring that the most accurate paths are identified for full production testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Actual delay measurements from preliminary testing are fed back into the prediction model to update and improve future predictions. This feedback mechanism continuously refines the accuracy of predicted critical paths by incorporating real-world data, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining testing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7647573B2Method and device for testing delay paths of an integrated circuit
Publication Date: 2010.01.12 NXP USA INC
  • US7647573B2 patent drawing
  • US7647573B2 patent drawing
  • US7647573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of testing critical delay paths of an integrated circuit design is disclosed. The method includes predicting and ranking a set of critical delay paths based on a set of predicted delay characteristics. Integrated circuits based on the integrated circuit design are tested to determine a set of actual delay measurements for the critical delay paths. The critical delay paths are ranked based on the actual delay measurements, and the results are correlated to the predicted ranking of critical delay paths to produce a confidence measurement that measures the likelihood that the actual critical delay paths of the design have been tested for a given production batch of devices.