IC Layout Design Methodology with Process Variation Bands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current integrated circuit design processes lack a reliable method to account for and compensate for variations in photolithographic process conditions, leading to potential manufacturing issues and reduced yield due to sensitivity to focus, dose, and other process variations.

Innovation Solution

The method involves calculating process variation bands (PV-bands) to determine the range of object dimensions that can be printed under various process conditions, allowing for the ranking of IC layouts by manufacturability and identifying necessary design adjustments to ensure robustness across different manufacturing scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional verification checks are performed without considering process variations, then the design verification process is simple and fast, but the circuit may fail to operate correctly under varying manufacturing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit operation reliability under process variationsVSAvoidverification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by calculating process variation bands (PV-bands) during the design verification stage, before actual manufacturing occurs. The PV-bands pre-characterize the range of dimensional variations objects may exhibit under different process conditions, allowing designers to proactively identify and correct potential manufacturing issues in the layout before fabrication, thus ensuring reliability without adding complexity to the manufacturing process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimensional aspect to layout verification by adding PV-bands as an additional layer of geometric information around existing layout objects. This dimensional extension allows the verification process to account for process variations in a systematic way, transforming a two-dimensional layout check into a three-dimensional analysis that includes the variation envelope, thereby improving reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through automated computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If PV-bands are calculated and analyzed to account for process variations, then manufacturability and yield are improved, but the verification process becomes more complex and computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout manufacturability under process variationsVSAvoidverification methodology complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual or rule-based verification methods with an automated computational system that calculates PV-bands using process characterization data. Instead of relying on designer expertise or simple geometric rules, the system automatically computes the variation bands by simulating process effects on the layout, substituting mechanical/manual verification processes with algorithmic computation that handles the complexity while providing precise manufacturability assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The PV-band calculation acts as an intermediary between the layout design and the manufacturing process. Rather than directly analyzing complex process variations against the layout, the patent introduces PV-bands as an intermediate geometric representation that captures the essence of process variation effects. This intermediary layer simplifies the verification process by providing a clear, visual, and computable metric for assessing manufacturability under variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional design rule checks are used without process variation consideration, then the verification process is straightforward, but the circuit layout may not be robust against focus, dose, and other photolithographic variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout robustness to photolithographic process variationsVSAvoidlayout verification ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by calculating PV-bands for individual layout objects or critical regions rather than applying uniform verification rules across the entire design. This allows different parts of the layout to be assessed with appropriate levels of detail and variation characterization, focusing computational resources on critical areas while maintaining ease of manufacture for non-critical regions, thus balancing robustness with verification simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8799830B2Integrated circuit layout design methodology with process variation bands
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC
  • US8799830B2 patent drawing
  • US8799830B2 patent drawing
  • US8799830B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for analyzing IC layouts and designs by calculating variations of a number of objects to be created on a semiconductor wafer as a result of different process conditions. The variations are analyzed to determine individual feature failures or to rank layout designs by their susceptibility to process variations. In one embodiment, the variations are represented by PV-bands having an inner edge that defines the smallest area in which an object will always print and an outer edge that defines the largest area in which an object will print under some process conditions.