Integrated Circuit Verification via Network Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional integrated circuit design verification techniques rely on approximations and simplifications, making it computationally exhausting to identify violations of design guidelines, particularly in regards to excessive current density that can lead to electromigration and other functional issues.

Innovation Solution

An integrated circuit design system incorporating a CAD application with a layout extractor, circuit simulator, and electrical rule check module that partitions circuit networks into segments, analyzes current flow, and identifies electromigration violations using detailed simulations and rule checks to ensure compliance with design specifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional automated design tools are used for verification, then design complexity is managed, but measurement precision of current density and electromigration risks deteriorates due to approximations and simplifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent density measurement precisionVSAvoidverification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit network is partitioned into multiple network segments based on current flow paths and electromigration risks. Each segment is analyzed independently to identify critical areas with excessive current density, enabling precise verification while managing overall complexity through systematic division of the verification task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different verification approaches are applied to different segments of the circuit network based on their specific characteristics and risk levels. High-risk segments with potential electromigration issues receive detailed analysis, while lower-risk segments are verified with appropriate simplifications, optimizing both precision and complexity management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If detailed simulations are performed to accurately evaluate current density, then measurement precision improves, but productivity deteriorates due to computationally exhausting verification processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent density measurement precisionVSAvoidverification speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is divided into segments that are processed in parallel or prioritized based on risk. This allows detailed simulations to be performed only where necessary while maintaining overall verification productivity through efficient task distribution and execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Detailed simulations are performed selectively on critical network segments that pose electromigration risks, rather than performing exhaustive detailed simulations on the entire circuit. This partial action approach maintains measurement precision for critical areas while improving overall productivity by avoiding unnecessary computational resources on lower-risk areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If approximations and simplifications are used in verification, then productivity improves, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to accurately identify electromigration violations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification efficiencyVSAvoiddesign verification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The verification approach applies different levels of detail to different circuit segments based on their reliability importance. Critical segments with high electromigration risk receive rigorous verification to ensure reliability, while less critical segments can be verified with simplified methods, thus maintaining both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The verification process incorporates feedback mechanisms that identify and prioritize segments requiring detailed analysis based on preliminary results. This feedback loop ensures that reliability-critical issues are not missed while maintaining efficient verification processes by focusing detailed analysis only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8713498B2Method and system for physical verification using network segment current
Publication Date: 2014.04.29 NXP USA INC
  • US8713498B2 patent drawing
  • US8713498B2 patent drawing
  • US8713498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A data processing system determines current information corresponding to a node included at a device design. Physical layout information corresponding to the node is received, the physical layout information including one or more layout geometries, the one or more layout geometries providing a circuit network. The circuit network may be partitioned into two or more network segments. A current conducted at a network segment is identified based on the current information. Information representative of dimensions and metal layer of a layout geometry included at the network segment is received. The computer determines that the current exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold, the predetermined maximum threshold determined based on the dimensions and metal layer.