Iterated Coordinate Descent for EDCT Material Decomposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CT systems face challenges in effectively handling material decomposition for energy discriminating computed tomography acquisitions, particularly in reducing noise and improving separation of material components using traditional reconstruction methods.

Innovation Solution

The method extends iterated coordinate descent (ICD) optimization to handle material decomposition for energy discriminating computed tomography (EDCT) by obtaining current path length estimates, performing a sequence of iterations, and solving small dimensional systems of linear equations to update pixel component values, incorporating prior information and achieving convergence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional reconstruction algorithms are used for energy discriminating computed tomography, then the processing speed is maintained, but the noise reduction and material component separation are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial component separationVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the material decomposition problem into multiple iterations where each iteration updates one material component at a time while holding others fixed. This coordinate descent approach divides the complex multi-material decomposition into simpler single-material optimization steps, improving both separation quality and maintaining computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements an iterative dynamic reconstruction process where the solution is progressively refined through multiple passes. Each iteration dynamically adjusts the material component estimates based on current projections, allowing the system to converge to a better solution without requiring static batch processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If iterative reconstruction techniques are applied to reduce image noise, then the measurement precision improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage noise reductionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial iteration by performing a fixed number of iterations or stopping when convergence criteria are met, rather than completing exhaustive iterations. This allows the system to achieve sufficient noise reduction without the full computational cost of complete convergence, balancing image quality with processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses preliminary actions such as analytical pre-processing steps and initial estimate generation before applying iterative refinement. This preliminary preparation reduces the burden on subsequent iterative steps, allowing faster convergence with fewer iterations and thus reducing overall processing time while maintaining noise reduction benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If direct material decomposition techniques are used, then the processing is faster, but the separation of material components and robustness to data quality problems deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness to data qualityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback loops where each iteration uses the current material component estimates to generate synthetic projections, compares these with actual measured projections, and uses the difference (residual) to update the estimates. This feedback mechanism continuously refines the solution and makes it robust to data quality issues by progressively correcting errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The iterative algorithm is self-correcting, automatically adjusting material component estimates based on inconsistencies in the data. The system serves itself by identifying and correcting its own errors through the optimization process, improving robustness without external intervention while maintaining reasonable processing speed through efficient update rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7551708B2Method of iterative reconstruction for energy discriminating computed tomography systems
Publication Date: 2009.06.23 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US7551708B2 patent drawing
  • US7551708B2 patent drawing
  • US7551708B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A new method extends iterated coordinate descent (“ICD”)—an optimization method employed in some statistical reconstruction algorithms—to handle material decomposition (“MD”) for energy discriminating computed tomography (“EDCT”) acquisitions.