Automated ICD-10 Coding Rules Engine for Clinical Documentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of ICD-10 coding, which includes anatomical locations, disease severity, and visit-related metadata, makes it cumbersome for physicians to manually select the appropriate codes, leading to time-consuming and clinically irrelevant translations using general equivalence mappings.

Innovation Solution

A rules engine-based system that uses a database to automate the designation of ICD-10 codes by employing algorithms that determine placeholder values based on patient information, including disease severity and anatomical locations, reducing the need for manual selection and crosswalks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If ICD-10 codes are used for disease classification, then diagnostic precision and statistical accuracy are improved, but coding complexity and physician burden increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic precisionVSAvoidcoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing patient information and pre-determining appropriate ICD-10 codes before the physician needs to make a selection. The automated coding system analyzes patient data, applies coding rules, and generates code recommendations in advance, eliminating the need for physicians to manually navigate complex code structures during patient visits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated coding system acts as an intermediary between patient information and ICD-10 codes. This intermediary automatically translates clinical documentation into appropriate disease classification codes, shielding physicians from the complexity of ICD-10 structure while ensuring accurate code assignment. The intermediary processes the complex mapping logic and presents simplified results to physicians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual ICD-10 code selection is used, then code accuracy can be maintained, but time consumption and workflow efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the automated coding system to independently determine and assign ICD-10 codes based on patient information without requiring physician intervention in the coding process. The system extracts relevant clinical data, applies coding algorithms, and generates code assignments automatically, freeing physicians from time-consuming manual coding tasks while maintaining accuracy through validated coding logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transforming unstructured patient information into structured coding parameters that directly map to ICD-10 code requirements. The automated system processes clinical documentation, identifies key diagnostic parameters, and converts them into appropriate code assignments, dramatically reducing the time required compared to manual code selection while maintaining reliability through consistent parameter mapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If general equivalence mappings are used for code translation, then implementation simplicity is improved, but clinical relevance and diagnostic accuracy worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidclinical relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by customizing code assignment to match specific patient conditions and clinical contexts rather than using generic mapping rules. The automated coding system analyzes patient-specific information and selects codes that precisely reflect the individual patient's diagnosis and clinical presentation, ensuring high clinical relevance while maintaining implementation simplicity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamics by making code assignment adaptive to individual patient characteristics and clinical scenarios rather than using static general equivalence mappings. The automated system dynamically processes patient information, applies appropriate coding logic, and generates context-specific code recommendations that maintain both implementation simplicity and high clinical relevance through real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20200105386A1Method and system to automate the designation of the international classification of disease codes for a patient
Publication Date: 2020.04.02 MODERNIZING MEDICINE INC
  • US20200105386A1 patent drawing
  • US20200105386A1 patent drawing
  • US20200105386A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for automating the designation of a disease classification code. In one embodiment, the system includes a rules engine; an input device for entering patient information in communication with the rules engine; an output device in communication with the rules engine; and a database in communication with the rules engine, the database comprising a plurality of rules for providing a disease classification code in response the input patient information, wherein each of the plurality of rules comprises at least one alpha-numeric character corresponding to a digit in the disease classification code; and wherein at least one of the plurality of rules comprises at least one alias rule comprising at least a second alpha-numeric character corresponding to a second digit in the disease classification code.