Ice Bagging Mechanism for Condensate-Free Cube Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ice bagging apparatuses suffer from the issue of ice cubes freezing together into larger blocks due to condensate during the defrost cycle of ice makers, resulting in undesirable ice formation for customers.

Innovation Solution

An ice bagging apparatus featuring a frame with a first and second ice collecting zone, a film feeding mechanism for forming heat-sealable plastic bags, and a directional ice transport system that crushes and separates ice blocks into smaller pieces using a helical drive spring and chute, minimizing water introduction and ensuring accurate ice measurement and bag sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ice is collected directly from the ice maker during defrost cycle, then ice production is continuous, but condensate causes ice cubes to freeze together into larger blocks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice production continuityVSAvoidice cube separation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The ice transport system segments the ice stream by using a rotating auger with flights that create discrete portions of ice, preventing condensate from freezing cubes together. The auger divides the continuous ice flow into separate batches that are individually conveyed to bags.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary ice collecting zone is introduced between the ice maker and the bagging zone. This intermediate zone allows ice to be collected during defrost cycles without directly contacting the bagging mechanism, and includes heating elements to melt condensate and prevent ice block formation before ice is conveyed to bags.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If upwardly directional auger is used to convey ice, then ice can be transported from collecting zone to bagging zone, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice transport capabilityVSAvoidtransport mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ice collecting zone is positioned at the same elevation as the bagging zone, eliminating the need for upwardly directional augers. Ice is conveyed horizontally between zones using a simpler auger mechanism, reducing system complexity while maintaining transport capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Device complexity

If ice maker dispenses ice directly into bag, then bagging process is simple, but condensate enters the bag during filling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebagging mechanismVSAvoidcondensate contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful condensate is extracted and removed from the ice stream in the intermediate collecting zone using heating elements that melt condensate away from the ice cubes before they are conveyed to the bagging zone. This prevents condensate from entering the bags during filling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If multiple ice collecting zones are used, then ice supply capacity is increased, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice supply capacityVSAvoidcollecting zone structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple ice collecting zones are merged into a single integrated system where ice from different sources (including defrost cycles) is collected in one zone and conveyed through a single auger to the bagging zone. This maintains increased ice supply capacity while reducing structural complexity compared to separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus effectively prevents ice blocks from forming, ensures efficient ice transport and separation, and maintains the quality of ice by minimizing water introduction, resulting in smaller, usable ice pieces and improved customer satisfaction.

Implementation Method 1

a helical drive spring and chute, minimizing water introduction and ensuring accurate ice measurement and bag sealing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

a film feeding mechanism for conveying two superposed heat-sealable elongated film webs of plastic from a film web stock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat sealing: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS8256195B2Ice bagging apparatus
Publication Date: 2012.09.04 REDDY ICE LLC
  • US8256195B2 patent drawing
  • US8256195B2 patent drawing
  • US8256195B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ice bagging apparatus which has a frame defining a first ice collecting zone with a collecting bin and an ice bagging zone, wherein the ice bagging zone has a film feeding mechanism that conveys two heat-sealable elongated plastic film webs and a welding apparatus to form a bag from the webs. The film feeding mechanism has rollers between which film webs are passed and pressed against each other. A measuring arrangement measures ice dispensed into the bag by a first ice transport system positioned between the two film webs that form the bag.