Ice maker ejection mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing icemakers face challenges in efficiently forming and removing ice pieces without causing damage or requiring excessive force, particularly due to the design of ice formation trays and ejectors, which can lead to increased energy consumption and reduced ice production efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates an ice formation tray with a unitary structure and an insert, along with an ejector shaft that spans between the tray's sides, allowing for a rotational mechanism to gently pry ice pieces away from the tray, reducing the breakaway force needed and enhancing ice removal efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a conventional ice formation tray and ejector design is used, then ice pieces can be formed and removed, but excessive force is required and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice production efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the ice formation tray, specifically incorporating tapered walls that angle inward from bottom to top. This parameter change in the tray structure reduces the breakaway force required for ice ejection, thereby decreasing energy consumption while maintaining ice production efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a rotating ejector mechanism that dynamically interacts with the ice pieces. The ejector rotates to gently pry ice pieces away from the tapered walls, creating a dynamic ejection process that requires less force compared to static ejection methods, thus reducing energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If a conventional ice formation tray and ejector design is used, then ice pieces can be formed and removed, but the force required to detach ice pieces is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of ice removalVSAvoidbreakaway force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the geometric parameters of the ice formation tray by incorporating tapered walls with specific angles. This parameter change creates a mechanical advantage that reduces the breakaway force required to detach ice pieces, making ice removal easier and requiring less force

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the ejection function into two components: the tapered tray walls that provide mechanical advantage and the rotating ejector that provides the ejection motion. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its function, with the tapered walls reducing required force and the ejector providing controlled movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the force required to detach ice pieces, increases ice production efficiency, and minimizes energy consumption by optimizing the design of the ice formation tray and ejector mechanism.

Implementation Method 1

Refrigerant can be circulated inside of pipes. The refrigerant conducts heat from water on a heat exchange.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

The water can freeze into ice cubes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFreezing: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS10281186B2Ice maker ejection mechanism
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 OXEN
  • US10281186B2 patent drawing
  • US10281186B2 patent drawing
  • US10281186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ice making system and method that includes an ice formation tray, an ejector, and an ejector shaft is disclosed herein. The ice formation tray has a first side and a second side. The ejector includes a unitary structure and an insert, with the unitary structure encompassing the insert on at least four sides. The ejector shaft spans between the first side and the second side of the ice formation tray, with the ejector shaft passing through a bore in the insert of the ejector.