Rotatable Ice Tray Ejection Using Local Heating and Adhesion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional icemakers have complex configurations requiring a heater, ejector, and overfill detection mechanism, leading to high production costs, limited ice production capacity, and excessive energy consumption due to full heating of the ice tray before ice ejection, which results in water splashing and ice sticking issues.

Innovation Solution

An icemaker with a rotatable ice tray and a separation device, such as a heater, that applies energy to reduce the adhesive force between ice and the tray, allowing efficient ice ejection using the ice's weight and rotational force, eliminating the need for a large overfill detection mechanism and minimizing energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a heater is mounted on the lower surface of the ice tray to heat the ice tray for ice ejection, then the ice can be melted enough to be ejected smoothly, but too much energy is consumed and water may splash together with ice

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice ejection smoothnessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The heater is positioned at specific locations (front and rear ends of the lower surface) rather than covering the entire lower surface, concentrating heating energy only where needed for ice separation and ejection, thus reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining effective ice release

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The heater operates briefly before ice ejection to pre-melt the ice tray surface, creating sufficient lubrication for smooth ejection without requiring continuous or excessive heating, thereby reducing energy consumption while ensuring operational effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If the conventional icemaker includes an over fill detection mechanism and ejector operation device, then ice ejection can be controlled, but the configuration becomes complicated and production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice ejection controlVSAvoidicemaker configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ejector operation device is integrated with the water supply control mechanism, combining multiple functions into a single control system that manages both water supply timing and ejector operation, thereby simplifying the overall configuration while maintaining automated control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control device performs multiple functions including water supply control, ejector operation control, and ice making cycle management, allowing a single device to handle various control tasks that would otherwise require separate mechanisms, thus reducing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If the over fill detection mechanism is made rotational to detect ice bank fill level, then detection can be performed, but large space is required near the ice tray

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice bank fill level detectionVSAvoidspace near ice tray
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The over fill detection mechanism transitions from a rotational design requiring horizontal space to a vertical linear movement design, utilizing the vertical dimension for detection motion, thereby significantly reducing the horizontal space requirement near the ice tray while maintaining detection functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the production of a large quantity of ice in a short time while minimizing water splashing and ice sticking, reducing energy usage and simplifying the icemaker's structure, thus enhancing efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

a separation device which separates the ice from the ice tray... such as a heater, that applies energy to reduce the adhesive force between ice and the tray

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS7810346B2Icemaker and method for controlling the same
Publication Date: 2010.10.12 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US7810346B2 patent drawing
  • US7810346B2 patent drawing
  • US7810346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An icemaker and a method for controlling the same are disclosed. An object of the present invention is to provide an icemaker and a method for controlling the same, which has an improved structure to make a lot of ice in a short time. an icemaker includes an ice tray rotatable with at least one column of ice making chambers formed therein to make ice; an ejector rotatably provided in each ice making chamber to eject the ice formed in the ice making chamber; an operation device which rotates the ice tray; and a separation device which separates the ice from the ice tray. The separation device may be a heater which heats the ice. Preferably, the heater is operated until adhesive force which acts between the ice and the ice tray is smaller than pushing force in which the ejector pushes the ice.