Integrated Development Environment Failure Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing code review systems are separate from development environments, making it cumbersome and time-consuming for users to detect and correct failures during the build process, as they need to switch between different user interfaces, disrupting their workflow.

Innovation Solution

Integrating a failure detection system within the development environment to display real-time build output, failure data, and correction suggestions, allowing users to track the active build stages, identify error locations, and receive proposed corrective actions directly within the development environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a separate code review system is used outside the development environment, then failure detection capability is provided, but user workflow is disrupted due to frequent interface switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection capabilityVSAvoiduser workflow continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the code review system and development environment into a single integrated platform. The code review interface is embedded within the development environment, allowing developers to perform code reviews without leaving their primary development tools. This integration eliminates the need to switch between separate applications, maintaining workflow continuity while preserving failure detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If code review is performed outside the development environment, then failure detection is enabled, but time is lost due to interface switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detectionVSAvoidtime for interface switching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By integrating the code review functionality directly into the development environment, the system eliminates time-wasting interface switching. Developers can review code, detect failures, and make corrections all within the same application window, significantly reducing the time spent on context switching and interface navigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary code review actions automatically during the build process. By pre-configuring the integrated environment to monitor and analyze code changes in real-time, the system detects failures before they propagate, reducing the time needed for manual intervention and interface switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If an integrated failure detection system is implemented within the development environment, then workflow continuity is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow continuityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated system employs multi-functional components that serve both development and code review purposes. The same user interface and tooling are used for both writing code and reviewing it, eliminating the need for separate specialized systems. This universality reduces overall system complexity while maintaining workflow continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11327723B1Development environment integrated with failure detection system
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 RED HAT LLC
  • US11327723B1 patent drawing
  • US11327723B1 patent drawing
  • US11327723B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology disclosed herein enables performing code review during an active build. An example method may comprise causing, by a processor of an integrated development environment, execution of a software build job by a build tool, wherein the software build job comprises source code. The example method may further comprise tracking, using the integrated development environment, the execution of the software build job by receiving progress data associated with the execution. The example method may further comprise displaying, via a graphical user interface (GUI) of the integrated development environment, a plurality of lines of the source code. The example method may further comprise, responsive to detecting a failure during the execution, displaying, on the GUI, an information identifying the failure and a suggested corrective action.