IDE Merge Conflict Detection via Preliminary Branch Merging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In collaborative software development environments, merge conflicts and compilation errors often go undetected until changes are committed, leading to time-consuming and difficult manual resolution processes, especially when multiple users concurrently work on the same or different versions of source code.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that periodically upload uncommitted changes to a version control system for merging against all branches, including other users' uncommitted changes, and perform a build operation to detect potential merge conflicts and compilation errors before changes are committed, notifying users through the IDE with markers or notifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users work on source code concurrently in a distributed environment, then development collaboration and productivity are improved, but merge conflicts and compilation errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment collaborationVSAvoidmerge conflict detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary build operations and merge conflict detection before users commit their changes. By creating temporary branches and attempting to merge uncommitted changes against the code base, the system identifies conflicts early, allowing users to resolve them before final commitment and reducing overall development time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback to users about merge conflicts and compilation errors through notifications and markers in the IDE. This feedback mechanism allows users to see the impact of their changes immediately and adjust their work accordingly, improving collaboration reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual merge resolution is performed after conflicts are detected, then change integration is achieved, but time consumption and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange integrationVSAvoidmanual resolution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs the merge operation preliminarily by creating temporary branches and attempting to merge changes before final commitment. This preliminary merge action identifies all conflicts upfront, allowing users to resolve them in a single focused session rather than iteratively throughout the development process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates temporary branches as copies of the code base to perform merge operations. These temporary branches allow safe experimentation and conflict detection without affecting the main code base, enabling thorough review and resolution of conflicts before integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If changes are committed without real-time validation, then development speed is maintained, but duplicate efforts and wasted time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment speedVSAvoidduplicate effort time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs validation actions preliminarily by attempting to compile and merge changes before they are committed. This preliminary validation detects duplicate efforts and conflicts early, preventing users from wasting time on changes that will be rejected or cause conflicts later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback to users about compilation errors and merge conflicts through IDE markers and notifications. This real-time feedback allows users to adjust their changes on the fly, eliminating duplicate efforts and reducing wasted time on incompatible modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9940219B2Detecting merge conflicts and compilation errors in a collaborative integrated development environment
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 KYNDRYL INC
  • US9940219B2 patent drawing
  • US9940219B2 patent drawing
  • US9940219B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, and associated computer system and computer program product, of detecting source code merge conflicts and compilation errors. Uncommitted changes associated with a source code are received periodically at each time of a sequence of times. A temporary branch corresponding to each uncommitted change is merged to corresponding portions of the source code. It is ascertained that no merge conflict resulted from the merging and in response, a compilation of a merged version of the source code is performed, wherein the merged version of the source code includes the temporary branch corresponding to each uncommitted change. It is determined that no compilation error occurred from the compilation and in response, a version of a product that includes the merged version of the source code is created.