IDE-MTurk Integration for Domain-Specific Data Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current natural language processing algorithms require substantial domain-specific data, which is difficult to obtain economically and quickly, especially for developing systems like dialog interfaces, and existing methods fail to efficiently expand small amounts of expert data into larger datasets using crowdsourcing through an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) that directly engages the Mechanical Turk infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

An Integrated Development Environment (IDE) system that communicates with a Mechanical Turk (MTurk) engine to convert domain-specific requests into MTurk projects, allowing developers to create and expand domain-specific data sets by leveraging crowdsourced information, using an MTurk engine to receive and process requests, validate results, and integrate them back into the development project, potentially expanding data sets by 50 to 200 times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual processing and integration of expert information is used, then data quality and accuracy are improved, but time consumption and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing workflow into distinct modular components: (1) data collection from multiple sources including experts and crowdsourcing platforms, (2) automated preprocessing and validation, (3) integration into domain-specific formats, and (4) quality assurance. This segmentation enables parallel processing and automation of routine tasks while preserving manual review for critical quality decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated processing layer between raw data collection and final system integration. This intermediary includes validation rules, format converters, and quality filters that automatically process crowdsourced data before it reaches the final integration stage, reducing manual labor while maintaining data quality through programmable standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If crowdsourcing is used to expand data sets, then data quantity and diversity are improved, but data quality control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata quantityVSAvoiddata quality control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where crowdsourced data undergoes automated validation against predefined quality criteria, and results are fed back to refine the crowdsourcing process. Quality metrics are continuously monitored and used to adjust data collection parameters, filter criteria, and incentive structures to maintain consistent data quality across large volumes of crowdsourced contributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters of the data collection process by introducing automated validation rules, format standardization protocols, and quality threshold settings. These parameter changes transform the crowdsourcing process from unstructured data collection to a controlled process that maintains quality standards while scaling data quantity through programmable constraints and filters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated processing is implemented, then processing speed and scalability are improved, but integration complexity with existing systems increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the automated processing system with universal interfaces and standardized data formats that can integrate with multiple different target systems. The architecture includes adaptable connectors and configuration options that allow the same core processing engine to serve different domain-specific applications without requiring complete reimplementation, thereby reducing integration complexity while maintaining high processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If extensive manual integration of domain-specific data is performed, then system accuracy is improved, but development time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary automated processing, validation, and formatting of domain-specific data before it requires human review or integration. By pre-processing data to the extent possible through automation—including validation against domain rules, format conversion, and initial quality filtering—the system reduces the burden of manual integration while preserving accuracy through layered quality assurance that combines automated checks with targeted human expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10762430B2Mechanical turk integrated ide, systems and method
Publication Date: 2020.09.01 NANT HOLDINGS IP LLC
  • US10762430B2 patent drawing
  • US10762430B2 patent drawing
  • US10762430B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Mechanical Turk—Integrated Development Environment system is disclosed. An integrated development environment (IDE) can include one or more interfaces capable of communicating with a mechanical turk engine. As a developer creates applications within the IDE, the developer can use the IDE to submit one or more requests to the mechanical turk engine. The engine constructs a mechanical turk project based on the requests and provides project tasks to workers. The results of the tasks can then be compiled and integrated back into the developer's application via the IDE. An example use includes constructing large domain specific data sets that can be applied to spoken dialog interfaces.