Integrated Development Environment for Runtime Interface Redesign

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current integrated development environments (IDEs) are punitive to software iterations, requiring re-compilation and regression testing when changes are made to the user-interface, limiting flexibility and efficiency in software development.

Innovation Solution

An improved IDE that allows for the separation of the visual design layer from the data programmatic layer, enabling the redesign of the user-interface at runtime without re-compilation, and permits the creation of a modifiable superclass and subclass, allowing non-linear development without downstream penalties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the user interface is redesigned or modified in traditional IDEs, then the interface can be updated, but recompilation and regression testing are required which penalizes iteration speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface redesign capabilityVSAvoiditeration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the user interface from the underlying software logic by introducing a visual programming layer that operates independently. This allows the interface to be modified without affecting the core functional behavior, eliminating the need for recompilation and regression testing when redesigning the interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables dynamic modification of the user interface at runtime through a visual programming environment. Users can add, remove, or modify interface elements without recompiling the software, allowing continuous adaptation and iteration without time penalties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If the visual design layer is coupled with the data programmatic layer, then the software maintains structural integrity, but changes to the interface require changes to the underlying logic and recompilation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware structural integrityVSAvoidinterface modification ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the software into two independent layers: a visual design layer for interface creation and a data programmatic layer for underlying logic. This segmentation allows each layer to be modified independently while maintaining their functional relationship, enabling easy interface modification without compromising structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that connects the visual design layer with the data programmatic layer. This intermediary enables the visual elements to interact with the underlying logic without direct coupling, allowing interface changes without requiring changes to the core programmatic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If users must follow linear development steps, then the software development process is structured and controlled, but users cannot access or modify later development stages earlier without penalties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment efficiencyVSAvoiddevelopment process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables non-linear development by allowing users to access and modify any aspect of the software at any stage through the visual programming environment. Users can iterate on interface designs, add or remove elements, and modify behavior without following a strict linear sequence, thereby improving development efficiency without increasing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8661408B2Integrated development environment and methods of using the same
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 PSENKA MICHAEL JAMES
  • US8661408B2 patent drawing
  • US8661408B2 patent drawing
  • US8661408B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for generating, in an integrated development environment, a form from which a source code superclass and subclass can be generated. The form is modifiable such that the superclass and subclass integrity is maintained. The method comprises receiving, in an integrated development environment, objects to create a form, wherein the integrated development environment comprises one or more classes. The integrated development environment is utilized to run the form and store the form. The integrated development environment is further utilized to generate and store a superclass comprising one or more of the objects and one or more classes. The superclass is extended with a subclass. The integrated development environment is again utilized to modify the form and generate a new superclass based on the modified form, wherein the integrity between the new superclass and the subclass is maintained.