IDE Telemetry-Based Test Selection for Secure Distributed Coding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed programming environments face challenges in maintaining developer focus and adherence to coding standards and security protocols, exacerbated by remote work, leading to inefficiencies and prolonged testing processes due to lack of visibility into developer behavior and intelligent test suite selection.

Innovation Solution

A system that captures telemetry data from developer interactions to analyze coding patterns and generate a behavior/focus score, dynamically selecting appropriate test suites and providing real-time feedback to ensure secure and efficient code development.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the entire test suite is executed to ensure code quality and security, then the reliability of software is improved, but the time required for testing increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware qualityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system executes only a subset of test cases selected based on developer behavior analysis rather than running the entire test suite. The test selection module identifies and executes only those test cases most relevant to the current code changes and developer patterns, achieving adequate quality assurance with reduced testing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the test execution parameters by adjusting which test cases are selected and executed based on analyzed developer behavior patterns, code change types, and risk assessments. This parameter adaptation allows the system to optimize the balance between thoroughness and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive monitoring and analysis of developer behavior is implemented to improve code quality, then the manufacturing precision of code is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors and analyzes developer behavior automatically without requiring manual intervention or complex external monitoring infrastructure. The telemetry collection module gathers data from IDEs and development tools, and the analysis engine processes this data to generate behavior profiles that guide test selection, making the system self-sufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a telemetry collection module and analysis engine as intermediaries between developers and the testing process. These components capture developer behavior data, analyze patterns, and translate them into test selection decisions, simplifying the overall architecture while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If dynamic test suite selection based on developer behavior is implemented, then the productivity is improved, but the measurement precision of developer behavior requires advanced analytics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment efficiencyVSAvoidbehavior analysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of developer behavior patterns during the development process to predict which test cases will be most valuable to execute. By analyzing telemetry data in real-time and pre-selecting relevant tests before execution, the system achieves both high productivity and accurate behavior measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where test results and developer behavior data are continuously analyzed to refine behavior profiles and improve future test selections. This feedback mechanism enhances measurement precision over time while maintaining high productivity through increasingly accurate predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260064574A1System and method to orchestrate secure source code development in distributed programing environment using programmer telemetry and developer behavior-focus based test suite selection
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20260064574A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064574A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064574A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, computer program products, and methods are described herein for code development in a distributed programming environment using programmer telemetry and developer behavior-focus based test suite selection. The present disclosure is configured to capture telemetry data from developer interactions within an integrated development environment (IDE), preprocess and log the telemetry data for further analysis, analyze the data to discern developer behavior and focus levels using machine learning models, generate a focus score quantifying adherence to coding standards and security protocols, select and customize test suites based on the focus score, execute the test suites, and provide feedback to the developer. The system enhances code quality and security by dynamically adapting test suite selection based on real-time developer behavior, ensuring efficient and effective testing processes in a distributed environment.