Idea List Ranking Algorithm for Sales Knowledge Sharing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sales personnel often generate product ideas in isolation, leading to missed opportunities for sharing successful suggestions and guiding customers in their purchasing decisions, as existing systems lack effective mechanisms for collaborative idea sharing and feedback.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for creating and sharing 'idea lists' with weighted attributes, popularity scores, and relevance-based ranking, where users can add products to lists, view and copy items, and earn points for list interactions, promoting the propagation of popular and relevant ideas across the sales platform.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If sales people generate product ideas in isolation, then individual creativity is maintained, but knowledge sharing and collaboration are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct idea sharingVSAvoididea sharing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges isolated individual idea generation with collaborative knowledge sharing by creating a unified system where sales people's idea lists are aggregated into a shared database. This allows individual creativity to be preserved while simultaneously enabling team-wide access and collaboration through the central idea sharing platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary system - the idea sharing platform with its database and ranking mechanisms - that mediates between individual sales people and the organization. This intermediary captures, stores, and distributes product ideas while providing structured access through relevance ranking and popularity metrics, thus enabling knowledge transfer without direct interpersonal interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If idea lists are ranked by relevance only, then search accuracy is improved, but popular successful ideas may be overlooked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch relevanceVSAvoidsales effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the ranking parameter from purely relevance-based to a hybrid model that incorporates both relevance metrics and popularity signals. This dual-parameter approach ensures that ideas are ranked not only by their semantic match to search queries but also by their proven effectiveness in generating sales, thus balancing search accuracy with commercial productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where sales performance data and user interaction metrics continuously inform the ranking algorithm. Successful ideas that generate sales or receive engagement are fed back into the system to boost their visibility, creating a self-reinforcing mechanism that identifies and promotes high-performing product recommendations while maintaining relevance to customer needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If all idea lists are displayed equally, then comprehensive information is provided, but user attention and engagement are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidea list visibilityVSAvoiduser decision making
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the visibility and prominence of individual idea lists based on their attributes such as relevance score and popularity metric. Rather than treating all ideas uniformly, the system selectively enhances the presentation of high-quality ideas through ranking and featured positioning, while still maintaining access to the full set of ideas for users who wish to explore comprehensively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If the system tracks detailed user interactions to improve ranking accuracy, then recommendation quality is enhanced, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveranking accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates the key interaction data elements needed for ranking - such as views, copies, and sales - from the broader user behavior dataset. By focusing only on these specific, high-value metrics rather than processing all possible user interactions, the system achieves accurate ranking while minimizing data processing complexity and computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8595209B1Product idea sharing algorithm
Publication Date: 2013.11.26 BOUNDLESS NETWORK
  • US8595209B1 patent drawing
  • US8595209B1 patent drawing
  • US8595209B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for identifying products and product idea lists. A method is provided which includes searching a product index for a result. The result is used to search an idea list index for idea lists related to the result wherein each idea list includes at least one product and has an associated popularity and relevance to the search. The method also includes outputting at least some of the idea lists based on the popularity and relevance of the idea lists. In one embodiment a method of identifying product idea lists is provided. The method includes searching a product index for keywords associated with products in a product idea list. The method also includes using the keywords to search a product idea index for other idea lists and outputting the other idea lists based on their popularities. In some embodiments, the popularities may be based on time-weighted events.