Idempotent Task Execution in On-Demand Code Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing on-demand code execution systems face inefficiencies in handling idempotent tasks, as they often execute code multiple times despite unchanged dependencies, leading to redundant resource usage and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an on-demand code execution system that checks for changes in task dependencies before executing code, utilizing memoization techniques to determine if the state of dependencies has changed since the last execution, thereby avoiding unnecessary executions and reducing resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system executes code multiple times to ensure task completion, then reliability is improved, but resource usage and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution reliabilityVSAvoidcomputing resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by checking task dependencies and execution history before executing code. The worker manager queries the execution record data store to determine if a task has already been executed with the same dependencies, avoiding redundant executions and conserving computing resources while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by maintaining execution records that track task execution history and dependency states. The worker manager uses this feedback information to make intelligent decisions about whether to execute a task again, balancing reliability requirements with resource efficiency through data-driven execution decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system executes code multiple times to handle retries, then reliability is improved, but execution latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution reliabilityVSAvoidexecution latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary checks of the execution record data store before executing code to determine if retry is necessary. This preliminary action prevents unnecessary task executions and reduces latency by avoiding redundant processing while still ensuring reliable task completion when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The execution record data store provides feedback about previous task execution outcomes and dependency states. This feedback enables the worker manager to make intelligent retry decisions, reducing unnecessary latency from redundant executions while maintaining reliability through appropriate retries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the system checks task dependencies before execution, then resource efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary execution record data store that manages task execution history and dependency information. This intermediary component simplifies the complexity by centralizing execution state management, allowing the worker manager to efficiently check dependencies without complex distributed state tracking while improving resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If the system maintains execution records for all tasks, then idempotency detection is improved, but data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidempotency detection efficiencyVSAvoiddata storage volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and stores only the essential execution state information needed for idempotency detection in the execution record data store. By taking out only the critical dependency states and execution outcomes rather than maintaining complete task execution histories, the system improves idempotency detection efficiency while minimizing data storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10528390B2Idempotent task execution in on-demand network code execution systems
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10528390B2 patent drawing
  • US10528390B2 patent drawing
  • US10528390B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for handling requests to execute idempotent code in an on-demand code execution system or other distributed code execution environment. Idempotent code can generally include code that produces the same outcome even when executed multiple times, so long as dependencies for the code are in the same state as during a prior execution. Due to this feature, multiple executions of idempotent code may inefficiently use computing resources, particularly in on-demand code execution system (which may require, for example, generation and provisioning of an appropriate execution environment for the code). Aspects of the present disclosure enable the on-demand code execution system to process requests to execute code by verifying whether dependency states associated with the code have changed since a prior execution. If dependency states have not changed, no execution need occur, and the overall computing resource us of the on-demand code execution system is decreased.