Identification Information Assignment Apparatus for Automated Training Data Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual annotation of identification information for machine learning data is labor-intensive and time-consuming, especially with large amounts of data, which hinders the efficient generation of high-quality learning data.

Innovation Solution

An identification information assignment apparatus that acquires image data, uses a learning model to automatically assign identification information, and updates the model based on the assigned data, allowing for efficient generation of learning data by selecting and annotating image data in stages with improved accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual annotation is used to assign identification information to image data, then accuracy of annotation can be ensured, but labor time and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary annotation using a learning model before manual review, pre-processing the image data to assign identification information. This preliminary action reduces the subsequent manual work required while maintaining accuracy, as annotators only need to review and correct the pre-annotated data rather than annotate from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A learning model serves as an intermediary between the image data and the final annotated result. The model generates initial annotation predictions that bridge the gap between raw data and manually verified annotations, reducing the direct manual effort required while preserving accuracy through subsequent verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If a large amount of image data is processed manually, then comprehensive learning data can be generated, but productivity decreases due to labor intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of learning dataVSAvoiddata processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The annotation process is segmented into two distinct phases: automated annotation by the learning model and manual verification/correction. This segmentation allows the system to process large volumes of data through the efficient automated phase while maintaining quality through selective manual intervention, thereby increasing overall productivity without sacrificing data comprehensiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of annotation methodology from purely manual to a hybrid automated-manual approach. By adjusting the degree of automation and utilizing the learning model's capabilities, the system can process larger quantities of data at higher speeds while maintaining acceptable accuracy levels through subsequent verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated annotation using a learning model is used, then processing speed increases, but annotation accuracy may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoididentification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where manually verified and corrected annotations are used to retrain and update the learning model. This continuous feedback loop improves the model's accuracy over time, allowing it to produce more reliable initial annotations that require less manual correction, thereby maintaining both speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The learning model acts as an intermediary that generates initial annotations which are then refined through manual verification. This intermediary role allows the system to leverage the speed of automated processing while using human expertise to correct errors, achieving both high processing speed and maintained accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If iterative model updating is performed, then annotation accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs model updating as a preliminary or periodic action rather than continuously for every annotation task. By pre-updating the model with verified data and then using it for batch processing, the system achieves improved accuracy without the complexity of real-time iterative updates during annotation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12125274B2Identification information assignment apparatus, identification information assignment method, and program
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US12125274B2 patent drawing
  • US12125274B2 patent drawing
  • US12125274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

It reduces labor and time to generate training data for the training model. An identification information assignment apparatus includes an acquirer configured to acquire a plurality of pieces of image data, an assigner configured to assign identification information to image data selected from the plurality of pieces of image data by using a learning model after learning, and an updater configured to update the learned model using the image data to which the identification information is assigned, wherein the assigner assigns identification information to a rest of the image data acquired by the acquirer using the learned model that has been updated.