Identity-Based Transaction Decisioning for Fraud Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current identity verification methods for online financial transactions are inefficient in preventing fraudulent activities, as they rely on third-party data that focuses on credit risk rather than fraud prevention, leading to costly manual processing and potential fraudulent approvals.

Innovation Solution

Implementing identity-based transaction decisioning systems that apply business rules to potential fraud indicators, such as social security numbers, physical addresses, and transaction frequencies, to automate the authorization or decline of transactions, potentially using a decisioning score in conjunction with Customer Identification Program (CIP) verification results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If third-party identity scores are used for transaction decisioning, then credit risk identification is improved, but fraud prevention accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit risk identification accuracyVSAvoidfraud prevention accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the identity verification process into two distinct components: (1) third-party identity scores for credit risk assessment, and (2) proprietary fraud indicators for fraud prevention. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in its strength area, resolving the contradiction between credit risk identification and fraud prevention accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces proprietary fraud indicators as an intermediary layer between third-party identity scores and final transaction decisions. These indicators mediate the decision-making process by specifically addressing fraud risks that third-party scores miss, thereby improving fraud prevention without sacrificing credit risk identification capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual processing is used for potential fraud indicators, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but processing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated decisioning systems that self-evaluate potential fraud indicators using predefined business rules and algorithms. The system serves itself by automatically processing fraud indicators without requiring manual review for every case, thereby maintaining high fraud detection accuracy while dramatically improving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative fraud indicators into quantifiable parameters that can be automatically processed. By converting fraud indicators into measurable parameters with defined thresholds and weights, the system enables automated decisioning while maintaining detection accuracy, resolving the contradiction between manual accuracy and automated efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If identity verification is performed later in the approval process, then processing costs are reduced, but fraudulent approvals increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing costsVSAvoidfraudulent approvals
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs fraud indicator evaluation and identity verification at the earliest stage of the application process, before substantial processing resources are committed. By conducting preliminary fraud screening using automated systems, the patent prevents fraudulent applications from advancing to costly processing stages, thereby reducing overall processing costs while preventing fraudulent approvals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by proactively identifying and blocking fraudulent applications through fraud indicators before they can cause harm. The system preemptively counters fraud attempts by evaluating fraud indicators early in the process, preventing fraudulent approvals before they occur rather than detecting them after damage is done.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS9824358B2Fraudulent transaction detection system for use in identity-based online financial transaction decisioning system
Publication Date: 2017.11.21 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US9824358B2 patent drawing
  • US9824358B2 patent drawing
  • US9824358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention provide for systems to determine potential fraudulent activity associated with online financial transaction identity-based transaction decisioning, to electronically determine decisions for transactions such as account opening, and the like. The embodiments herein described accurately provide a system tool to prevent fraudulent transactions from occurring, such as preventing accounts from being opened by individuals who present an identity risk and efficiently identify such risky applicants early in an automated decisioning process. Specific embodiments provide for electronically determining a transaction decision based on applying business rules to potential fraud indicators. In other embodiments of the invention, a decisioning score is determined that takes into account the application of predetermined business rules to potential fraud indicators.