Personal Identity Data Matching with Predictive Attributes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing database searching technologies are inefficient in matching personal identity inquiries that include both expected and unexpected data attributes, as they rely on character-for-character comparisons and assume a specific structure, failing to utilize high-value predictive data elements and providing limited actionable feedback.

Innovation Solution

A method that receives an inquiry, determines a search strategy, searches a reference database, and outputs matches with feedback on the match quality, utilizing processing rules, attribute tables, and frequency tables to handle both expected and unexpected data components, and provide confidence indicators and actionable feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If character-for-character comparison methods are used for matching personal identity data, then the matching process is simple to implement, but the system cannot effectively handle unexpected data attributes and provides limited actionable feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle unexpected data attributesVSAvoidcomplexity of matching system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The matching system is segmented into distinct functional modules: data normalization module, predictive attribute generation module, similarity calculation module, and feedback generation module. Each module handles specific aspects of the matching process, allowing the system to handle unexpected attributes without requiring complete redesign of the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal matching framework that can process both expected and unexpected data attributes through the same pipeline. The predictive attribute generation module creates standardized representations of any input attribute, enabling the system to handle diverse data types uniformly without requiring attribute-specific processing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If traditional matching algorithms are used that rely on predefined data structures, then the system is easier to operate, but it cannot utilize high-value predictive data elements and synthesized indicia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of match resultsVSAvoidease of using the system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating predictive attributes and synthesized indicia from the input data before the actual matching process. This includes normalizing data formats, generating predictive attributes based on data relationships, and creating confidence scores in advance, which improves matching accuracy without requiring complex real-time processing during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components including predictive attribute tables, frequency tables, and confidence indicator mechanisms that mediate between raw input data and final match results. These intermediaries transform unstructured or semi-structured data into standardized, comparable formats while preserving high-value information, thereby improving accuracy without complicating the user interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the system provides detailed actionable feedback for each match, then the usability for business decisions is improved, but the amount of data processing and feedback generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusability for business decisionsVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial feedback generation by providing detailed actionable feedback only for the most relevant match attributes and confidence indicators, rather than analyzing every possible data element. This selective approach delivers sufficient information for business decisions while avoiding the processing overhead of generating exhaustive feedback on all attributes, thus maintaining productivity while improving usability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9442991B2Ascribing actionable attributes to data that describes a personal identity
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORP
  • US9442991B2 patent drawing
  • US9442991B2 patent drawing
  • US9442991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a method that includes (a) receiving an inquiry to initiate a search for data for a specific individual, (b) determining, based on the inquiry, a strategy and flexible predictiveness equations to search a reference database, (c) searching the reference database, in accordance with the strategy, for a match to the inquiry; and (d) outputting the match. The method may also output flexible feedback related to the match that reflects inferred quality of the match experience which can be used by an end-user to determine the degree to which the matched entity meets that end-user's quality-based criteria. There is also provided a system that performs the method, and a storage medium that contains instructions that control a processor to perform the method.