Identity Resolution Service for Duplicate Customer Profile Merging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Call centers face inefficiencies due to duplicate customer profiles across different systems, leading to time-consuming data parsing and inaccuracy in customer information access, which detracts from the customer experience.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an identity resolution service that uses merging criteria and machine learning models to identify and merge duplicate profiles, prioritizing data fields based on recency, source, and completeness to create a unified and accurate customer profile.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If multiple customer profiles are maintained across different systems, then data completeness is improved, but data accuracy and ease of access deteriorate due to duplicates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoiddata accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple duplicate customer profiles into a single unified profile by comparing data across different systems (Salesforce, SalesNow, etc.) and consolidating them. This eliminates duplicate entries while preserving complete customer information, thereby maintaining data completeness while improving data accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary profile comparison service that acts as a mediator between multiple customer profile systems. This service compares profiles from different sources, identifies duplicates, and facilitates their consolidation, resolving the contradiction between maintaining complete data across systems and ensuring accurate, non-duplicate information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If multiple customer profiles are maintained across different systems, then data completeness is improved, but agent productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming data parsing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidagent productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by automatically comparing and merging customer profiles before agents need to access them. The system proactively identifies and consolidates duplicate profiles across different systems, so when agents access customer information, they immediately receive a single, accurate profile without needing to manually parse multiple duplicates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple customer profiles into a single unified profile, consolidating data from different systems (Salesforce, SalesNow, etc.). This eliminates the need for agents to manually parse through multiple duplicate profiles, thereby preserving data completeness while significantly improving agent productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If profile merging is implemented, then data accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases due to merging criteria and machine learning models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated machine learning models that independently evaluate merging criteria and determine whether profiles should be merged. The system automatically compares profiles, applies merging rules, and consolidates duplicates without requiring manual intervention or complex configuration, thereby improving data accuracy while managing system complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by implementing machine learning models that dynamically evaluate multiple criteria (data completeness, recency, source reliability) to determine merging decisions. The system automatically adjusts merging parameters based on profile characteristics, improving data accuracy while managing complexity through adaptive, data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If manual profile parsing is performed, then data accuracy can be verified, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical profile parsing with automated machine learning-based comparison systems. The machine learning models automatically evaluate merging criteria, compare profiles across multiple systems, and determine accuracy without human intervention, thereby maintaining data verification accuracy while eliminating time consumption associated with manual parsing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary automated profile comparison and accuracy verification before agents need to access customer information. The system proactively merges and validates profiles using machine learning models, so when agents access customer data, accuracy has already been verified automatically, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11960459B1Merging duplicate customer data
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11960459B1 patent drawing
  • US11960459B1 patent drawing
  • US11960459B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for merging customer profiles, such as may be implemented by a computer-implemented contact center service. In some aspects, a subset of profiles may be determined that satisfy merging criteria, where individual profiles include a plurality of data fields. At least one value in a first data field that conflicts between at least two profiles may be identified. Next a merged value may be selected for the first data field based on data deduplication criteria, where the data deduplication criteria includes at least one indicator of accuracy of values of the plurality of data fields. As a result of a determination that at least the subset of profiles of the group of profiles meet the merging criteria, at least the subset of profiles may be combined into a combined profile using the merged value.