Identity Verification Anomaly Detection via Background Image Descriptors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing identity verification technologies struggle to detect high-quality image forgery and the use of 'front persons' in online services, leading to fraudulent account registrations that bypass KYC and AML restrictions, which are often part of digital banking and fintech services.

Innovation Solution

A method using a model to generate descriptors of visual features not associated with a user's face or identification document, comparing these descriptors across verification requests to identify anomalies, such as similar image sources or locations, thereby detecting fraudulent serial attempts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing identity verification technologies analyze facial features or identity documents to detect forgery, then they can identify obvious fakes, but they fail to detect high-quality image forgery and front persons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and analyzes background elements from identity verification images rather than focusing on the person's face or document. By taking out the background information (location, lighting conditions, objects around the person), the system can detect patterns that indicate fraud without being fooled by high-quality forgeries or front persons who present themselves legitimately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The background serves as an intermediary element that indirectly reveals fraud patterns. Instead of directly analyzing the person's identity (which can be manipulated), the system uses background features as a mediator to infer whether the verification is legitimate, since fraudsters often reuse the same backgrounds across multiple verification attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the system analyzes only the person's face and document in identity verification, then verification is simple, but fraud detection capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification simplicityVSAvoidfraud detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the identity verification image into distinct components: the person's face/document and the background. By analyzing these segments separately, the system maintains the simplicity of direct verification while adding fraud detection capability through background pattern recognition. The background analysis is performed as a separate segment that complements the traditional verification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If high-quality image forgeries are used, then identity verification is successfully spoofed, but the system lacks the capability to detect such sophisticated fakes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforgery qualityVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of trying to detect the person's identity accuracy (which is vulnerable to high-quality forgeries), the system inverts the approach by analyzing the background environment. The background remains consistent across legitimate verifications but varies when different locations are used, providing a reliable detection mechanism that is not affected by the quality of facial or document forgeries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Productivity

If the system processes each identity verification request independently, then processing is efficient, but serial fraud attempts using the same templates are not detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidfraud detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the analysis of multiple identity verification requests by extracting and comparing background features across different requests. Instead of processing each request completely independently, the system combines background information from multiple requests to identify patterns and serial fraud attempts, maintaining processing efficiency while enhancing fraud detection reliability through cross-request analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250218225A1A method for detecting anomalies in identity verification
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 RARITEX TRADE LTD
  • US20250218225A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218225A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218225A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technical solution aims to verify digital identity and more particularly to verify digital identity by online proofing.A method for detecting anomalies in identity verification performed by a processor comprises the following steps (FIG. 1, FIG. 2): receiving an identity verification request comprising image data (10), wherein the image data contains a person's face; generating an image data descriptor (11) using a model (20) configured to determine a set of visual features not associated with the person's face in the input image data (10); searching for image data descriptors similar to said generated image data descriptor (11) among image data descriptors belonging to other identity verification requests; in response to finding at least one similar image data descriptor, marking said identity verification request as anomalous, otherwise marking the request as not anomalous.