IDO/TDO Inhibitor Compound Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IDO and TDO inhibitors have limitations in effectively targeting both enzymes for broad therapeutic efficacy across various diseases, including cancer, infectious diseases, and neurological conditions, due to structural differences and varying affinities for tryptophan.

Innovation Solution

Development of a novel compound with a specific structural formula that acts as a potent inhibitor of IDO and/or TDO, capable of inhibiting both enzymes, thereby disrupting tryptophan metabolism and immune tolerance in tumor microenvironments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current IDO and TDO inhibitors are used, then some therapeutic effect is achieved, but they cannot effectively target both enzymes due to structural differences and varying affinities for tryptophan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to target both IDO and TDO enzymesVSAvoidtherapeutic efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a single compound structure (formula I) that can inhibit both IDO and TDO enzymes. The compound contains a core structure with specific substituents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8) that can be optimized to interact with both enzyme types, enabling one agent to perform multiple therapeutic functions across different disease states where either enzyme may be relevant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying the chemical structure parameters of the inhibitor compound (different substituents at various positions on the core structure) to optimize binding affinity for both IDO and TDO enzymes. This allows tuning of the molecular properties to achieve effective inhibition of both enzymes simultaneously, overcoming the limitation of previous inhibitors that were optimized for only one enzyme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a compound is designed to inhibit both IDO and TDO, then broad therapeutic coverage is achieved, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroad therapeutic coverageVSAvoidmolecular structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the complexity issue by using a unified core molecular structure that inherently provides the capability to bind both IDO and TDO enzymes. Rather than designing separate complex structures for each enzyme or using a mixture of compounds, a single versatile scaffold (formula I) is employed with modifiable substituents, simplifying the overall therapeutic approach while maintaining broad coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the molecular structure into a core framework and variable substituent regions (R1-R8). This modular approach allows the core structure to provide the essential binding capability for both enzymes, while the substituents can be optimized independently to fine-tune affinity and selectivity, thereby managing structural complexity in a systematic way.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the affinity for tryptophan is increased to enhance enzyme inhibition, then inhibitory action is improved, but selectivity between IDO and TDO may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinhibitory actionVSAvoidenzyme selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing different substituents at specific positions on the core molecular structure to create regions with distinct binding characteristics. Certain substituents (R1-R8) can be optimized to interact with specific features of IDO or TDO active sites, allowing the compound to maintain high affinity for both enzymes while preserving necessary selectivity through localized structural variations rather than uniform modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by systematically modifying the chemical properties of substituents (such as hydrophobicity, electronegativity, steric bulk) at different positions on the core structure to optimize the balance between affinity and selectivity. This allows fine-tuning of the compound's interaction with each enzyme's active site to achieve potent inhibition while maintaining appropriate enzyme preference based on therapeutic needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The compound exhibits excellent inhibitory action on IDO and TDO, offering a wide range of therapeutic applications, including cancer treatment by enhancing immune response and reducing tumor growth.

Implementation Method 1

The compound of formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of the compound exhibits excellent inhibitory action on indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and/or tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase (TDO)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme inhibition: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentUS20220380305A1IDO/TDO Inhibitor
Publication Date: 2022.12.01 GENERAL ASSOC PHARMA VALLEY PROJECT SUPPORTING ORG
  • US20220380305A1 patent drawing
  • US20220380305A1 patent drawing
  • US20220380305A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A compound of formula (I) given below or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of the compound is useful as an IDO/TDO inhibitor. Thus, the compound of formula (I) or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt of the compound can be used as, for example, a therapeutic agent for a disease or a disorder selected from tumor, infectious disease, neurodegenerative disorder, cataract, organ transplant rejection, autoimmune disease, postoperative cognitive impairment, and disease related to women's reproductive health [in the following formula (I),ring A represents an aromatic ring, a heterocyclic ring, or a condensed ring of two or more rings selected from an aromatic ring, and a heterocyclic ring, wherein ring A is selected from the group consisting of a benzene ring, a naphthalene ring, a quinoxaline ring, a thiophene ring, an indole ring, a benzothiophene ring, an imidazole ring, a quinoline ring, a quinazoline ring, and a pyridine ring;X, R1 and R2 represent a substituent on a ring atom constituting ring A, wherein R1 and R2 are bonded to adjacent ring atoms of ring A;m represents an integer of 1 or 2;X is a halogen atom, and when m is 2, each X is the same or different;R1 and R2 are the same or different;R1 and R2 independently represent a group represented from the following groups:—(CH2)n—Y—R4 whereinY is selected from the group consisting of O, S, SO, SO2, and Se,n represents an integer of 1 to 8,R4 representswherein R41, R42 and R47 are the same and are a hydrogen atom