Two-Stage IGBT Gate Discharge for Surge-Suppressed Turn-Off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor devices face challenges in suppressing voltage surges during IGBT switching, which can lead to insulation breakdown, while maintaining adequate gate charge extraction capability to prevent malfunction. Existing technologies struggle to balance these competing requirements.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor device with a driving circuit comprising a first transistor, a second transistor, a comparator, an AND circuit, and a delay circuit, where the first transistor extracts gate charges with a first force upon IGBT turn-off, and the second transistor extracts with a stronger force after a delayed signal, ensuring the gate voltage is maintained low without excessive voltage surges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If gate charge extraction capability is strengthened to ensure reliable IGBT turn-off, then malfunction is inhibited, but voltage surge increases causing insulation breakdown risk

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIGBT turn-off reliabilityVSAvoidvoltage surge
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gate charge extraction process is segmented into two distinct phases: first transistor extracts gate charges with moderate force initially, then second transistor provides stronger extraction force later. This segmentation allows the extraction process to be controlled in stages, preventing sudden strong extraction that causes voltage surge while ensuring complete turn-off reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first transistor performs preliminary gate charge extraction before the second transistor activates. This preliminary action reduces the gate voltage gradually in advance, preparing the IGBT for turn-off while avoiding immediate strong extraction that would cause voltage surge. The delay circuit ensures this preliminary action occurs at the optimal timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If gate charge extraction capability is weakened to suppress voltage surge, then insulation breakdown is avoided, but IGBT turn-off reliability decreases causing malfunction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage surgeVSAvoidIGBT turn-off reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction capability is segmented between two transistors with different extraction strengths. The first transistor provides gentle initial extraction to suppress voltage surge, while the second transistor provides stronger extraction to ensure complete turn-off. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by distributing extraction functions across different stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gate charge extraction is performed periodically in two stages: first transistor activation period for gentle extraction, followed by second transistor activation period for stronger extraction. This periodic action allows voltage surge suppression followed by reliable turn-off completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Device complexity

If single transistor is used for gate charge extraction, then device complexity is reduced, but inability to balance voltage surge suppression with turn-off reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving circuit complexityVSAvoidIGBT turn-off reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single transistor extraction function is segmented into two transistors with distinct roles. This segmentation, while increasing component count, enables precise control of extraction timing and strength, achieving reliable turn-off with voltage surge suppression that a single transistor cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The delay circuit acts as an intermediary between the control signal and the second transistor activation. It introduces precise timing control, ensuring the second transistor activates at the optimal moment when voltage surge has subsided but complete extraction is still needed, balancing reliability and surge suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10110207B2Semiconductor device and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 FUJI ELECTRIC CO LTD
  • US10110207B2 patent drawing
  • US10110207B2 patent drawing
  • US10110207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device for driving a semiconductor switch, including a first transistor configured to extract gate charges of the semiconductor switch with a first extraction force, a comparator configured to compare gate voltage of the semiconductor switch with a threshold voltage to thereby output a first decision signal, an AND circuit configured to perform an AND operation on a gate voltage of the first transistor and the first decision signal to thereby output a second decision signal, a delay circuit configured to delay the second decision signal by a predetermined time and to output the delayed signal as a second control signal, and a second transistor configured to be turned-on, in response to the second control signal, the predetermined time after the first transistor is turned-on, to thereby extract the gate charges of the semiconductor switch with a second extraction force larger than the first extraction force.