IGCC Combustion with CO2 Mixture for Pure Carbon Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

IGCC technology with CO2 capture suffers from reduced efficiency due to energy-intensive CO conversion and non-selective CO2 separation, which increases equipment and operating costs, and requires secondary stages for sulfur compound separation.

Innovation Solution

The method involves gasification of fuels in an entrained or fluidized bed gasifier, followed by catalytic raw gas hydrolysis to remove HCN and COS, selective scrubbing to remove H2S, and combustion of the desulfurized gas with a mixture of oxygen, CO2, and water vapor in a gas turbine, allowing for efficient separation and compression of CO2, thereby eliminating unnecessary stages and reducing energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If CO conversion and CO2 separation stages are implemented in IGCC technology, then CO2 capture is achieved, but energy efficiency decreases by up to 10%

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 emissionsVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the energy-intensive CO conversion and CO2 separation stages from the IGCC process by directly combusting the raw gasification gas. This extraction eliminates the harmful CO2 emissions issue while preserving energy efficiency, as the combustion process naturally converts carbon to CO2 without requiring separate conversion and separation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of the conventional approach of converting CO to CO2 then separating CO2, the patent inverts the logic by directly combusting the raw gas mixture (containing CO, H2, and other components) to produce CO2, which is then separated. This inversion simplifies the process flow and reduces energy consumption by eliminating the exothermic CO conversion step that currently reduces efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If CO conversion is performed, then CO2 is produced for separation, but chemical energy is converted to heat and can only be used for steam generation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 productionVSAvoidchemical energy utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the CO conversion function with the combustion process. Instead of separately converting CO to CO2 and then using the heat for steam generation, the CO is directly combusted along with other combustible components (H2, CH4) in the gas turbine combustion chamber. This combining allows the chemical energy to be directly converted to mechanical work in the turbine while producing CO2 for separation, thereby improving energy utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If non-selective CO2 separation is performed with sulfur compounds, then CO2 capture is achieved, but secondary separation stages are required increasing equipment complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 and sulfur removalVSAvoidseparation equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the separation process into two distinct stages: first, selective desulfurization to remove sulfur compounds from the raw gasification gas before combustion; second, CO2 separation from the combustion exhaust. This segmentation allows each separation stage to be optimized independently, reducing the need for complex multi-stage processes and simplifying the overall equipment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary desulfurization of the raw gasification gas before combustion. By removing sulfur compounds in advance, the subsequent CO2 separation from combustion exhaust becomes more efficient and less complex, as the exhaust gas composition is more predictable and the separation process doesn't need to handle interfering sulfur compounds simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If CO2 compression and underground storage are implemented, then CO2 is removed from atmosphere, but additional energy and equipment are required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 atmospheric removalVSAvoidCO2 compression energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by using the CO2 produced from combustion as the working fluid for the power generation cycle itself. The CO2-rich exhaust gas drives the power turbine, and the compressed CO2 is then utilized for various purposes (enhanced oil recovery, carbonation, etc.) rather than requiring separate compression and storage infrastructure. This reduces the additional energy and equipment requirements by making the CO2 compression serve dual purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances energy efficiency by simplifying CO2 separation and reducing equipment and operating costs, resulting in a CO2-free power generation process with improved overall efficiency and reduced energy expenditure.

Implementation Method 1

gasification of the fuel, e.g. in an entrained bed gasifier at temperatures of between 1250 and 1700° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGasification:

Implementation Method 2

cooling the gas turbine's exhaust gas consisting of carbon dioxide and water vapor and condensing out the water vapor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

performing catalytic raw gas hydrolysis at temperatures between 150 and 250° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

catalytic raw gas hydrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 5

selective scrubbing to remove the H2S

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 6

combustion of the desulfurized gas with a mixture of oxygen, CO2 and water vapor in a gas turbine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 7

combustion of the desulfurized gas with a mixture of oxygen, CO2 and water vapor in a gas turbine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBrayton Cycle: Brayton Cycle

Implementation Method 8

downstream steam turbine which uses the gas turbine's waste heat steam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam expansion:

Implementation Method 9

compressing the abstracted carbon dioxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS8813507B2Method for producing motor energy from fossil fuels while dissipating pure carbon dioxide
Publication Date: 2014.08.26 SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG
  • US8813507B2 patent drawing
  • US8813507B2 patent drawing
  • US8813507B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing electric energy from solid and liquid fuels is provided. The fuels are first subjected to a gasification process at high pressure, and the scrubbed gasification gas is fed to a gas and steam turbine process. The combustion of the scrubbed gasification gas in the gas turbine chamber does not occur with air, but with a mixture made of the three components oxygen, carbon dioxide and water vapor. As a result, the waste gas of the gas turbine is made only of carbon dioxide and water vapor. After the condensation thereof, technically pure carbon dioxide remains, which can be dissipated by storage in the deep substrate of the atmosphere.