Flying Object Igniter Reliability via Dual-State Threshold Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flying object operating devices, such as igniters, lack reliability in preventing malfunctions, which can lead to safety issues and hinder the widespread adoption of drones and similar flying objects.

Innovation Solution

A flying object operating device with an abnormality detection unit, flight state detection unit, energizing circuit, and calculation unit that ensures the operating unit is only activated when both are functioning correctly, preventing accidental activation and enhancing safety reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional flying object operating devices are used, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability is insufficient and malfunctions cannot be prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of flying object operating deviceVSAvoidcomplexity of operating device system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The abnormality detection unit performs preliminary detection of the operating unit's state before activation. The calculation unit compares detection results with thresholds in advance to determine whether the operating unit is abnormal, preventing malfunction before it occurs rather than responding after failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the operating unit through the abnormality detection unit and uses the calculation unit to compare detection results with predetermined thresholds. This feedback mechanism provides real-time information about the operating unit's state, enabling the control unit to make informed decisions about activation and prevent malfunction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the operating unit is activated without checking its operability, then the ease of operation is high, but malfunction may occur due to undetected abnormalities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguarantee of normal operationVSAvoidsimplicity of activation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The operating unit performs self-diagnosis through the abnormality detection unit, which detects its own operational state. The calculation unit automatically compares detection results with thresholds and determines abnormality. This self-service mechanism ensures the unit is functional before use without requiring manual checking, maintaining ease of operation while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and comparison of the operating unit's state before activation. The calculation unit determines whether the operating unit is abnormal by comparing detection results with predetermined thresholds, ensuring the unit is ready for operation before it is activated, thus preventing malfunction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the operating unit can be activated at any time, then the responsiveness is high, but accidental activation may occur leading to safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of accidental activationVSAvoidresponse time of operating unit
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The abnormality detection unit continuously monitors the operating unit's state and provides feedback to the calculation unit. The calculation unit compares detection results with thresholds and determines whether activation conditions are met, ensuring the unit is only activated when appropriate and functional, preventing accidental activation while maintaining rapid response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary determination of abnormality by comparing detection results with predetermined thresholds before activation. This preliminary check ensures the operating unit is only activated when it is functional and conditions are appropriate, preventing accidental activation while maintaining fast response time through automated real-time monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12122522B2Flying object operation device, malfunction prevention method for flying object operation device, flying object thrust generation device, parachute or paraglider deploying device, and airbag device
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 NIPPON KAYAKU CO LTD
  • US12122522B2 patent drawing
  • US12122522B2 patent drawing
  • US12122522B2 patent drawing

AI summary

[Problem] Provided are a flying object operating device, a malfunction preventing method for a flying object operating device, a flying object thrust generating device, a parachute or paraglider deploying device, and an airbag device, each capable of improving reliability in terms of safety. A flying object igniter includes an ignition unit, an ignition abnormality detection unit which detects an operating state of the ignition unit, a flight state detection unit which detects a flight state of a flying object, an energizing circuit which has an energizing circuit switch for operating the ignition unit, and a calculation unit which compares a detection result obtained by the ignition abnormality detection unit and a detection result obtained by the flight state detection unit with respective thresholds set beforehand, and turns on the energizing circuit switch in accordance with the comparison result.