Ignition Coil Protective Casing Stiffness via Spring Shoulder Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ignition coils with metal sleeves in their protective casings increase manufacturing costs and reduce flexibility, making them less suitable for engines with smaller spark plug diameters and less reliable in axial force absorption.

Innovation Solution

The protective casing is made stiffer without additional components by supporting the spring's block section on a shoulder within the casing, allowing for reduced material usage and a smaller diameter, enhancing axial force absorption and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If metal sleeves are integrated into the protective casing to reinforce it, then the protective casing becomes stiffer and more reliable, but manufacturing costs increase and the diameter of the protective sheath increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective casing reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the metal sleeves from the protective casing design, extracting the reinforcing function to the support shoulder integrated into the casing structure itself. This eliminates the need for additional metal components while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The support shoulder is merged directly into the protective casing as an integrated structural feature rather than a separate component. This combines the casing and support functions into a single piece, reducing part count and manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If metal sleeves are integrated into the protective casing to reinforce it, then the protective casing becomes stiffer and more reliable, but the flexibility of the protective sheath is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective casing reliabilityVSAvoidprotective sheath flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The metal sleeves are removed from the design, extracting the rigid reinforcing elements that constrained the flexible protective sheath. The support shoulder provides necessary structural support without compromising the overall flexibility of the casing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If metal sleeves are integrated into the protective casing, then the protective casing becomes stiffer, but the diameter of the protective sheath increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective casing strengthVSAvoidprotective sheath diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The support shoulder is integrated into the protective casing as a built-in feature rather than an external addition. This merging of functions allows the casing to provide both protection and support without requiring additional radial space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The protective casing is designed as a flexible shell that can provide structural support through its geometry and material properties without requiring thick walls or additional rigid components that would increase diameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Force

If the spring block section is supported on a support shoulder within the protective casing, then the protective casing becomes stiffer and can absorb higher axial forces, but the spring axial position must be precisely controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial force absorptionVSAvoidspring axial position
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The support shoulder is pre-formed as an integral feature of the protective casing during molding. This preliminary formation of the support structure eliminates the need for separate positioning operations and ensures consistent spring placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The support shoulder geometry is optimized to provide adequate spring positioning through its dimensional parameters (height, radius, position). By carefully selecting these parameters during design, the system achieves both force absorption capability and acceptable positioning tolerance without requiring ultra-precise manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces production costs, improves axial force absorption, and ensures reliable attachment to spark plugs, making the ignition coil suitable for smaller engines with reduced risk of spring dislodgment.

Implementation Method 1

a spring (15) for electrically connecting the high-voltage connection (9) to the spark plug (5)... the protective jacket (16) can absorb comparatively high axial forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The support shoulder (20) also secures the axial position of the spring (15) in the protective casing (16), so that the spring (15) cannot fall out of the protective casing (16)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

the spring (15) is axially prestressed between the high-voltage connection (9) and the support shoulder (20)... The axial pretensioning of the spring results in a higher flexural rigidity of the protective casing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Data Source

PatentEP2165070B1Ignition coil
Publication Date: 2017.03.01 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2165070B1 patent drawing
  • EP2165070B1 patent drawing
  • EP2165070B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Known ignition coils have a high-voltage connection, a spring for electrically connecting the high-voltage connection to a spark-plug and an elastic protective jacket that surrounds the spring. The windings of the spring lie in a block against one another in a block section that faces the high-voltage connection and are interspaced in a spring section designed to contact the spark-plug. To permit the ignition coil with the elastic protective jacket to be pushed easily onto the spark-plug, said protective jacket is reinforced by the integration of two metal sleeves. However, the disadvantage of these sleeves is that they involve higher production costs and increase the diameter of the protective jacket. In addition, the sleeves reduce the flexibility of the protective jacket. In the ignition coil according to the invention, the rigidity of the protective jacket is increased without additional components, thus cutting production costs and reducing the diameter of the protective jacket. According to the invention, the end of the block section (15.1) of the spring (15), facing the spring section (15.2), is supported on at least one support shoulder (20) of the protective jacket (16).